Suggestions
Adam Kessler
Managing Director at DevLearn
Adam Kessler is the Managing Director and co-founder of DevLearn Consultancy, a firm specializing in international development consulting.12 He is an experienced monitoring and evaluation specialist who focuses on developing practical results measurement systems for significant projects.
Professional Background
Adam's expertise lies in several key areas:
- Results Measurement: He has a strong background in creating simple yet effective systems for measuring project outcomes.2
- Communication: DevLearn offers communication consultancy support, likely leveraging Adam's skills in this area.1
- Implementation: The firm provides implementation consultancy, indicating Adam's experience in project execution.1
DevLearn Consultancy
DevLearn Consultancy, co-founded by Adam Kessler, offers services in:
- Monitoring and evaluation
- Communication support
- Implementation consultancy
- Results measurement systems development
The company primarily operates in the international development sector.12
Additional Information
Adam Kessler is also involved in speaking engagements and thought leadership. He has been noted to participate in "DevLearn Dialogues," which suggests he may be active in industry discussions and knowledge sharing.3 His LinkedIn profile (username: adam-kessler-7616021a) likely provides more detailed information about his professional experience and achievements in the field of international development consulting.
Highlights
I’m excited to say that DevLearn Consultancy has a podcast!
Our first one is with Alexandra Miehlbradt, talking about systemic change. We covered why assessing systemic change isn’t actually that hard, how our sector has improved over the last decade, and my most embarrassing work-based moment with the Donor Committee for Enterprise Development. (Actually my second-most embarrassing, but the first isn’t for LinkedIn.)
Please do have a listen, and subscribe and rate if you find it interesting. Please also let me know if you listened – it will give much-needed motivation to make a second 😊
A quick technical question for veterans of debates about 'systemic change' in the MSD community.
For years, practitioners measured 'copying' as a metric of systemic change (among other metrics). This basically meant the passing on of information among project participants. If I train one farmer in better agricultural practices, and they pass this information on to three of their friends, I can report one 'direct' beneficiary and three 'indirect' beneficiaries. The concept of 'copying' is still used in systemic change frameworks today, albeit less than it used to be.
The reason this strikes me as weird is that 'copying' is in no way restricted to MSD programmes. No matter how direct, unimaginative or un-systemic the project is, it should always be able to report copying. If any programme providing training can lead to copying, it seems flawed as a measure of 'systemic' change.
Am I missing something? Is there more to the concept than I see, or a reason why copying is particularly relevant in MSD?
