Suggestions
Daniel L. Black
Executive and Asset Manager Driving Value Creation through Digital Transformation
Andrew Mark is an accomplished professional with a diverse background in Government, Finance, and Management. He holds an A.B. degree in Government from Dartmouth College and completed his College/University Preparatory education at Montclair High School. Andrew has held key roles in various prestigious organizations, including Sensata Technologies, Advent Convertible Securities & Income Fund, The Wicks Group, and The Bank of New York, where he served in leadership positions such as Managing Director, Managing Partner, Senior Vice President, and Trustee/Director. With a wealth of experience in merchant banking, corporate banking, and board governance, Andrew has demonstrated his expertise across multiple sectors.
Highlights
Through my work on boards and helping portfolio and investee companies think through the opportunities and challenges they face in their businesses looms the question of China and the direction it is taking economically and politically in recent years.
My fascination with this rising power v incumbent power dynamic has even caused me to read the History of the Pelloponesian War (don’t try this at bedtime). China watchers will get the reference to Thucidydies Trap.
The rally in Japanese equities has also caused me to think about what caused this 30 year sleep in Japan and why has its equity markets recently awakened. Maybe it was just too cheap? I am on the journey to find out and would welcome input from my community.
I thought some comparative work on Japan and China, not because of their proximity and intertwined history but because I wonder if China is entering a similar period as did Japan, a big sleep, as there are some striking similarities in the dynamics, obviously offset by national policy, power and economic differences that cause completely different behaviors at the leadership levels of politics and business interests.
Quick read. All thoughts are welcome.
The banking crisis over the past week has shed new light on a few fundamental flaws in the US banking system once again. The reality is there is a lot of cash floating around out there and it moves fast when danger is perceived. I am sure that Janet Yellen’s testimony today that - to praphrase what I heard - the US Treasury will only “stand behind the depositors of banks that pose a risk to the financial system” will cause some sleepless nights out there.
Secretary Yellen made quite a statement but what else could she say? She isn’t the first Financial big to imply “too big/important to fail” but I have never heard it spoken as plainly. Henry Paulson famously vomited at the prospect during the last financial crisis and who could blame him? Reality really messed with his value system!
The natural inclination for any responsible depositor after the Secretary Yellens comments is to move your money to one of those banks that are too big and important to fail (I modified with the “importance” which should be “perceived importance”).
Tonight there are deposit taking institutions and their boards that have to be wondering, “are we in that systemically important camp?” If they gotta ask they obviously know the answer. Deposits are moving as we speak.
On a purely economic basis there are still too many banks and yet there are still underserved markets and banking deserts in this country. Big underappreciated problem. What is the current purpose of the 12 Fed Distrcts in todays economy anyway?
Banks sould consolidate and take advantage of new technologies yet our financial system is operating on rules that are basically a hundred plus years old and hard to change. The system is creaky, inefficient and dangerous. Thankfully we do have a Fed and a Treasury but we have antiquated tools, operating beneath a broken political system with a broken patchwork of state regulation in a world that is changing at digital speeds.
Unfortunately we only have the political will to patch things up in a crisis. We are having one - we’re patching up and tomorrow may bring on the next crisis. The fact that depositors were emptying their demand deposit accounts on their iPhones was not contemplated in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the 1930s depression era banking laws or any of the new millennium legislation to address the calamities of the 2008-2009 Financial Crisis. I am still not really sure how AIG and GE Capital commercial paper issuances were supported by the “government” or how Goldman got a commercial banking charter overnight. But it seemed to work for a minute!
I am just observing and not criticizing. This is hard stuff. But we should expect to go from crisis to crisis until we figure it out. I am certain it’s not good for the capital markets or the financial system and that’s problematic and costly for us all.
