Suggestions
AnnaMaria Andriotis
Reporter at The Wall Street Journal
AnnaMaria Andriotis is a seasoned reporter with a focus on banking, payments, and consumer lending matters. Currently part of The Wall Street Journal's banking team, she specializes in covering Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover, and major banks' credit-card divisions. Her in-depth knowledge extends to credit and debit cards, as well as changes in lenders' underwriting standards affecting consumers' credit reports and scores.
AnnaMaria holds Bachelor's and Masters degrees in English Literature from Fordham University. Her rich professional background includes roles at reputable organizations such as The Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch.com (Dow Jones), SmartMoney.com, and Trader Monthly, showcasing her extensive experience in finance journalism.
With an impressive track record in reporting on financial institutions and consumer finance trends, AnnaMaria Andriotis demonstrates a deep understanding of the intricate workings of the banking and payments sectors. Her writings provide valuable insights for readers seeking comprehensive coverage of the evolving landscape of credit, lending, and payment technologies.
Highlights
It was late one night when I received a phone call from someone at Goldman Sachs that I realized my colleague Andrea Fuller and I would stay the course on a story we had been working on about the lack of women partners' advancement further up the ranks at the Wall Street giant.
A very successful woman partner at Goldman was questioning whether she had been wrong to invest many years of her life working at the firm. This woman, who like many others I spoke with isn't mentioned in the article, had learned that a high-level executive who wasn't her boss was speaking negatively of her. I asked: Why does that bother you? It's just talk. The woman answered: He's one of the most senior executives here and will likely ascend further. She wondered whether it was time to look for a job somewhere else.
When David Solomon became CEO of Goldman Sachs just over five years ago, he made promoting women to senior levels of the firm a priority. It hasn't worked out, and many women and some men partners who I spoke with argued that the firm has moved backwards on this front. One data point out of many in the The Wall Street Journal story https://lnkd.in/ePmmgqvu that my colleague Andrea played a critical role in crunching data for: Roughly two-thirds of the women who were partners at the end of 2018 have left the firm or no longer have the title. The same can be said of just under half of male partners at the time.
On the firm's 25-person management committee, there are 2 women partners in revenue-producing roles: Beth Hammack, whose retirement Goldman announced last month, and Stephanie Cohen, who is not expected to return to Goldman after going on leave for personal reasons last year. Partner is one of the highest levels executives at Goldman can reach. For many men and women, this occurs after years of hard work and sacrifices. And it's at this level where it has been very hard to impossible for women to move further up into Goldman's highest levels, whether it's running a major division, becoming CFO, or being in line to succeed the CEO.
Few firms on Wall Street have mastered moving women up to their highest ranks, but some Goldman peers appear to have made more progress. At JPMorgan Chase & Co., two leading contenders to replace its CEO are women. Citi's CEO and Morgan Stanley's CFO are women.
This story came to be after a highly respected executive first shared concerns about a high-level male executive's behavior towards women. I began placing calls and realized the issues went beyond just one person. Some sources said: Crunch the numbers and you'll find this is an institutional problem. My colleague Andrea and I set out to see where the reporting and numbers would lead us.
What's your take on the lack of women in Goldman's highest levels? Remember to follow The Wall Street Journal on LinkedIn.
It was only last October when Goldman Sachs said it extended its credit-card partnership with Apple to the end of the decade. Things began unraveling soon after when Goldman decided it was going to exit consumer lending. In the summer, I reported that Goldman was talking to American Express to gauge its interest in taking over the Apple credit-card partnership. It was the first clear-cut piece of information that I received from my sources that Goldman wanted out of the credit card deals it had built in recent years. Recently, I heard an interesting twist, which I reported today: Apple told Goldman Sachs it wants out of the partnership https://lnkd.in/dXbx32DC.
Apple recently sent a proposal to Goldman to exit from the contract in the next roughly 12-to-15 months, people briefed on the matter told me. The exit would cover their entire consumer partnership, including the credit card the companies launched in 2019 and the savings account rolled out this year.
Exiting credit-card deals is complicated and this one is more complex than the average deal. Apple has had many demands about what it wants its bank partner to do. They include approving nearly all applicants regardless of their credit score (which has contributed to loan losses at Goldman) and sending all cardholders their credit card bills at the beginning of the month (a customer-service nightmare that has contributed to regulatory scrutiny that Goldman is currently under).
Apple's proposal to end the contract with Goldman has big implications for many. For consumers, the credit card should continue to work (as credit cards generally do when they are in the process of transitioning to a new issuer); For Goldman, it spells the end of its foray into consumer lending. It's offloading its credit card with General Motors and recently agreed to sell GreenSky, a lender that specializes in home-improvement loans.
What's your take on Apple's move to exit its credit-card deal with Goldman? Remember to follow The Wall Street Journal on LinkedIn.
