Sign In

Anupam Goel

Physician executive - Using technology to support scalable solutions that achieve higher value for our healthcare spend - Re-imagining care delivery to be more patient-centric

Anupam Goel is a healthcare professional passionate about leveraging health information technology (health IT) to drive transformative changes in the American healthcare system by addressing knowledge gaps, improving decision-making, and supporting behavior change for better health outcomes.

Anupam Goel shares insightful articles on health-related topics on https://anupamgoel.com alongside his professional engagements.

His educational background includes studies at Barnes - Jewish Hospital Washington University, Emory University for Medicine, Emory University School Of Medicine for Doctor Of Medicine In Medicine, and San Diego State University for Master Of Business Administration in Business.

Anupam Goel's professional journey includes roles such as Medical Director at Accolade, Inc., General Internal Medicine Physician at Plushcare and Advocate Aurora Health, Chief Health Information Officer at Unitedhealth Group, Vice President at Advocate Health Care, Associate Director at University Of California, San Diego, Co-Principal Investigator at San Diego Beacon Collaborative, and Associate Professor at University Of California, San Diego.

Highlights

Oct 14 · linkedin

"By 2020, for the first time, less than half of U.S. physicians worked in physician-owned settings: more than 300,000 U.S. practicing physicians were employed by hospitals, and another 122,000 were employed by corporations of various kinds — health insurers, pharmacy chains, private equity-backed companies. A single diversified health insurer, UnitedHealth Group, claims to employ or represent 60,000 physicians through its Optum Health subsidiary. [..]

In accepting employment, physicians old and young shifted their business risk to corporate enterprises, which absorbed the resultant decline in productivity and negative practice cash flows in exchange for achieving overarching corporate objectives: increased hospital admissions, imaging scans, and surgeries; the redirection of patient flows away from hospitals; or increased prescriptions or traffic in retail stores. [..]

Given the macro trends, what will determine the future role and influence of practicing physicians in the care system? Here are a few questions that need answers:

--Will absorbing physicians’ costs as a “loss leader” generate sustainable economic returns for corporations where the main business purpose of employing them was not the actual delivery of medical care? --For how long will physicians remain motivated to work for organizations where reducing medical expenses or redirecting patient trajectories after their visits — rather than achieving clinical excellence or meeting patients’ actual needs — is the main objective? --Will physicians seeking influence over the conditions of medical practice eventually clash with corporate cultures, operational control, and human resource policies?

These questions are not entirely rhetorical, and ultimately pertain to corporate culture and the values that underlie it."

*I used to work for UnitedHealth Group as a physician executive.

Sep 17 · linkedin

"When I started my psychotherapy practice twenty-five years ago, I wanted to earn a good income—but I also wanted to help people who couldn’t easily afford therapy. Eventually, I joined all possible insurance panels so that many of my patients could just pay a low co-pay, typically $15 to $40 per session. The insurance companies reimbursed me at a rate of $60 per session. That was considerably less than my going rate of $120 to $150 during that time, but by accepting insurance I was able to treat those who would have had difficulty affording my usual fee. Still, I kept some appointment slots open for private-pay patients who didn’t have insurance and were willing and able to pay more for therapy. [..]

All went well for the first three or four years. Then I started to notice something a little troubling. Whereas most employed people receive raises from time to time, years went by with no change in my compensation from insurance companies. I checked with other therapists and everyone else experienced this as well. It got to the point after a few years where we were paid less per session than the price of a mani-pedi or salon haircut. Not to denigrate salon workers, but they typically don’t need to invest years of post-graduate education, training, and expense to qualify for their jobs. Meanwhile, I was able to raise my private pay rate over the years to match the going rate in our profession. [..]

More and more therapists only see patients who pay us directly. None of my close colleagues who have been in practice for a long time accept insurance. A quick perusal of the Psychology Today website in my general community shows that less than twenty percent of the therapists listed accept insurance. Typically, these therapists are relatively new to the profession and are building their practices. Many therapists find it much more gratifying to be in charge of our own therapy practices instead of relying on insurance companies to treat us fairly. We set our own fees. Many of us offer sliding scale payments to try to accommodate those who can’t easily afford therapy.

Some therapists will take insurance, but only for a limited number of clients, and often when potential clients with insurance contact them, they will simply say they are unavailable instead of trying to explain the situation. [..]

My hope is that insurance companies will raise their therapist reimbursement rates to increase the number of available appointments for their members. No one wants to pay monthly premiums and not be able to receive mental health care, and it is essential that everyone who seeks mental health assistance be able to obtain it. But even if more mental health providers join the field, they will still need to be able to make a living at their jobs."

Anupam Goel
Add to my network

Location

United States