Suggestions
Brad Sostack, MBA
Two decades of experience in operations, strategy and transformation.
Brad Sostack, MBA is a transformation leader with over 20 years of experience in leadership roles across private, military, and government sectors.1 His career has been marked by success in various domains:
Professional Experience
Current Roles::
- Board Member at Citadel Analytics (UK) Ltd. (since 2019)2
- Independent Consultant (Self-employed since 2018)2
Military Background:: Brad served in the US Navy for over 10 years, where he supervised and directed operations and maintenance.34
Expertise
Brad is known for his:
- Transformation leadership skills
- Extensive experience across private, military, and government sectors
- Ability to drive organizational change and improvement
Education
He holds an MBA from the University of Florida.1
Additional Information
- In 2018, Brad briefly pursued a political career as a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives.2
- He currently serves as the Global Head of Portfolio at Citadel Defense Management Company LLC.4
Brad Sostack's diverse background in military service, business leadership, and consultancy positions him as a versatile professional with a wealth of experience in organizational management and strategic planning.
Highlights
Feeling stuck in your career?
Andrew can help you out!
Andrew H. Hartnett, MBA is a friend, a coach, and a brand advisor who created a Formula 4 Success to help you plan your strategy, and execute your plan. Start a conversation!
https://lnkd.in/gm5qTQRK
Financial incentives can compromise the critical faculties of an individual. Here are four versions of this insight:
- Never argue with a man whose job depends on not being convinced.
- It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.
- It can be very hard to understand something, when misunderstanding it is essential to your paycheck.
- It is rather pointless to argue with a man whose paycheck depends upon not knowing the right answer.
I found the above quotes from the early 1900’s compelling. I’d add these four more, and I’m sure there are many other ways to say the same thing.
- It is difficult for someone to question a structure which they depend on for financial support.
- A person will protect and preserve a broken system if it means their salary is uninterrupted.
- To argue with someone motivated by financial incentives, when you are not, is futile.
- Highest comprehension of a contentious issue will be obtained when all financial incentives are removed.
Do you have another interesting way to explain this insight?
