Suggestions
Bram Wessel
Principal, Factor; Instructor, School of Visual Concepts.
Bram Wessel is a co-founder and Principal at Factor Firm LLC, an information architecture and experience design consultancy based in Seattle, Washington.1 With over 25 years of experience in user-centered design and research, Bram specializes in helping organizations address complex enterprise-level information and user experience challenges.12
Career Highlights
- Co-founder of Factor: Established in 2013, Factor focuses on aligning people, platforms, and processes to improve outcomes for customers, employees, and businesses.12
- Information Architecture Instructor: Teaches at the School of Visual Concepts in Seattle since 2013.1
- Experience Strategist: Has worked with numerous high-profile clients, including Adobe, Amazon, Disney, Expedia, Microsoft, Nordstrom, and Starbucks.3
Expertise
Bram's work centers on:
- Enterprise information architecture
- User experience strategy
- Taxonomy development
- Information layer optimization
He is known for his approach of applying user-centered design principles to enterprise-scale information problems, helping organizations better connect with their intended audiences.24
Professional Involvement
Bram is active in the information architecture community:
- Member of the Information Architecture Institute (IAI)
- Member of the Seattle chapter of the International Interaction Design Association (IxDA)4
Bram Wessel's expertise in information architecture and user experience design has made him a respected figure in the field, with a focus on creating effective digital experiences that reflect human goals and behaviors.12
Highlights
I recently took in an art exhibit that made me think a lot about semantics in content. Join me on a journey through the Fifty-three Stations of the Tōkaidō.
Last week, Factor’s Erik Lee and I attended the Data Governance and Information Quality (DGIQ) conference in San Diego. I’d like to thank Tony Shaw and the DATAVERSITY organizing team for inviting Erik to speak about taxonomy governance at a conference focused on data governance. It was enriching to gain fresh insights from professionals in an adjacent field. In addition to Erik’s talk we saw some great talks by John Moran, Donny Bronson and Julie Giese, Scott Garner, Marni Frandson and Renate Witt, and Jo Zichterman.
Here are our takeaways:
🎯 Our fields have much to offer each other! In fact, they are closely related. We attended several talks about data governance steering committees, and our recommendation to information architects would be to join one of these committees! Similarly, data governance committees can greatly benefit from input from information architects and taxonomists. We’re all essentially engaged in domain modeling, so let’s collaborate!
🎯 Governance is governance. While the things being governed may differ, there's significant overlap in methodology and toolsets. It’s crucial to secure buy-in from both grassroots stakeholders and leadership. Make it matter to the business. Several talks emphasized the importance of understanding the psychology of leaders – their needs, their language, and their concerns – in gaining support and funding for governance initiatives. It’s essential to demonstrate how governance directly impacts the business and how it will bring about tangible improvements.
🎯 Overall, we established new connections, engaged in valuable conversations (especially with Stephanie D., Amelia Landesman, Doug Berman, and Jo Zichterman,) and expanded our knowledge.
If you also attended DGIQ in San Diego last week, we'd love to hear about your takeaways and insights. Share them with us in the comments!
