Suggestions
Brian X. Chen
Lead Consumer Technology Writer at The New York Times
Brian X. Chen is the Lead Consumer Technology Writer at The New York Times, a position he has held since July 2015. In this role, he is responsible for reviewing consumer technology products and writing the "Tech Fix" column, which addresses the social implications of technology in everyday life. Chen also previously led the Personal Tech newsletter and contributed to the expansion of the daily tech newsletter, "On Tech" .12
His career at The New York Times began in November 2011, where he initially served as a technology reporter covering major companies like Apple and various wireless carriers. Before joining The Times, Chen worked as a freelance writer and was involved in launching The Wirecutter, a product recommendation site acquired by The Times .2
Chen's educational background includes a degree in English Language and Literature with a minor in Film Studies. He has received several awards for his work, including a National Magazine Award finalist recognition and a George Polk Award for National Reporting in 2019 .23
In addition to his technology writing, Chen has also reported on business news and contributed articles about Asian and Asian American cinema for the culture desk, showcasing his versatility as a journalist .2
Highlights
Remember when social media was social? I realized Instagram was done when my wife's posts were no longer showing up in my feed, because she'd been algorithmed out by marketers. (My Instagram feed these days is 99 percent sponsored posts from motorcycle brands.) TikTok is fun but doesn't really feel social - most of us are just gawking at people's videos. And now that Twitter is making people pay a subscription for their posts to show up in others' feeds, the concept of the public-facing online "platform," as we've come to know it, is over.
Like many, I wondered, "What will be the next Twitter or Facebook?" But after I started interviewing scholars and academics, I realized that the next big thing in social may not be a huge global network at all. It's the rise of small networks. People are increasingly slicing and dicing their time and online identities across a myriad of smaller networks that restore a sense of community. I wrote about all of this for my column, which ran on the front page of today’s print edition of The New York Times:
Ever since fitness trackers from Fitbit became trendy over a decade ago, we've always been skeptical about their accuracy. How could a bracelet really know how many calories I'm burning? Yet over the years, more advanced wearables from companies like Apple and Garmin came along, making all sorts of bold new claims about what they could accurately track. (Blood oxygen! Sleep! Heart arrhythmia!) Now their smartwatches even show a metric that fitness enthusiasts say can be a more accurate reflection of how old you are than your actual age: the VO2max, the maximum amount of oxygen your body can consume during intense exercise.
After my Apple Watch made me aware of my low VO2max last year, I joined a high-intensity interval gym to boost my cardio fitness. But I eventually took a clinical-grade lab test to measure my real VO2max and learned that the Apple Watch, along with a Garmin I tested alongside it, gave wildly inaccurate VO2max estimates.
This all raised a question that I explored in my column this week for The New York Times: What good are wearable computers if the data is wrong? Health experts I interviewed agreed that while wearable data may be inaccurate, the broad trends we can glean about our health do matter. https://lnkd.in/gQq9KReR
