Suggestions
Bryan Lane
Assistant Director, Business Intelligence
Bryan Lane is a technology and data analytics professional with extensive experience in both government and private sector roles. He currently serves as the Chief of Business Intelligence Services at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).1 Some key points about Bryan Lane include:
Professional Experience
- Current Role: Chief of Business Intelligence Services at the FDIC since September 20211
- Previous Positions:
- Director of Data & AI at GSA (2019-2021)
- Senior Product & Technology Advisor at Augr Consulting LLC
- Product Owner at PIXIA Corp
- Senior Consultant at IBM
- Multi-Int Fusion Analyst at Six3 Systems
Military Background
Bryan served in the United States Marine Corps as an Arabic Linguist and Tactical SIGINT Collector from 2003 to 2008.1 During his service, he was deployed to Fallujah, Iraq during the surge from 2006 to 2007.3
Education and Skills
- Bachelor of Science in Economics from George Mason University1
- Proficient in Arabic with professional working proficiency1
- Certified Project Management Professional (PMP)1
- Recently completed a Programming with Python certification from Carnegie Mellon University1
Additional Roles and Initiatives
- Founder of DATA XD, described as "The World's Fastest Growing Cross-Domain Community Of Practice For Data Analysts"1
- Known for his expertise in artificial intelligence, security, and policy integration in the defense sector2
Bryan Lane is recognized for his ability to bridge the gap between technology and policy, particularly in the areas of AI implementation and defense strategies.2 His diverse background, spanning from military service to high-level government positions, has given him unique insights into the challenges and opportunities at the intersection of technology, security, and policy.
Highlights
What if instead of (or in addition to) asking agencies to submit an inventory of AI use cases to OMB, we asked agencies to submit one AI success an organization got value from and one failure with a lesson learned?
I read this and sense the core assumption here is that small, smart, cheap, and many autonomous systems will be operating in environments where we have control of the electromagnetic spectrum.
What if we don’t?
Would be curious to hear from people that are working electronic warfare around protecting autonomous systens.
Thinking on this takes me back to the ole Radio Bn days.
