Suggestions
Damiano Ramazzotti
Entrepreneur working on community, coliving and venture building.
Damiano Ramazzotti is the CEO of WeTipp.com, a platform facilitating engagement for non-profits, grassroots organizations, and co-working spaces.
Previously served as the COO at Talent Garden, a prominent European coworking space network in the digital sector.
Experienced in youth participation, intercultural dialogue, training, project management, and facilitation.
Co-founded the NGO Binario Uno and the international network East West East, focusing on active participation.
Passionate about photography, martial arts, rock climbing, wellbeing, and meditative practices.
Educational background includes entrepreneurship studies, trainer training for European youth projects, and sociology.
Former roles include co-founder, advisor, project manager, and head of community in various organizations.
Engaged as a facilitator for the worldwide Wikimedia Conference in 2013 and as an English teacher, trainer, and consultant.
Also served as a karate instructor, self-defense instructor, youth leader, and training assistant in different capacities.
Highlights
Any physicist interested in consciousness who is open for a chat? Looking for some feedback on a paper
Scattered reflections on the moratorium in the field of artificial intelligence (AI).
It is possible that the only thing capable of containing a mad or malevolent AI is a more capable and powerful AI.
This can create a sense of urgency to create one at all costs, as happened with the atomic bomb...but in a context where research costs much less and everyone can develop applications and do research.
It is highly likely that a moratorium could slow down research a bit, but not in a truly significant way.
There are five assumptions that I believe we should reflect on (during a possible moratorium or not):
- We may soon create an AGI (artificial general intelligence) with capabilities comparable to that of a human brain in the near future. 2)Many believe that an AGI is sentient. Others believe that it is currently impossible with the current paradigm (including myself).
- We don't know if a sentient AGI is more or less harmful to humans.
- AGIs could potentially become impossible to control at some point.
- If AGIs are impossible to control, the only option is to understand how to make them act positively on their own will.
This means that we cannot help but ask ourselves two things (however absurd it may seem):
- What consciousness is
- What benevolence is
In addition, there is the risk that: a) Some may believe that an AGI is sentient when it is not, projecting onto it a transcendent nature, perhaps with the risk of venerating it. b) And vice versa, that an AGI is sentient but we do not recognize its rights and dignity.
This will make understanding what consciousness is and its relationship with computers urgent even from a cultural point of view.
Since:
- I do not believe that a purely computational system can become sentient,
- And given how many scientists have shown an impulse to project sentience onto computers without solid evidence, ...I think the first will be the most common problem: We will have many who are convinced that some AIs are sentient even if they are not. Practically the opposite of what science fiction has predicted for years.
