Suggestions
Daniel Shaposhnikov
Partner at Phystech Ventures
Daniel Shaposhnikov is a prominent venture capitalist and partner at Phystech Ventures, a venture capital firm he co-founded in 2013.1 He has been active in the venture capital industry since 2009 and has an impressive track record of 33 deals with 8 successful exits.
Professional Background
Daniel's expertise spans several key areas:
- Venture Capital: As a Managing Partner at Phystech Ventures, he leads the AI/ML, energy, and mobility verticals.1
- Entrepreneurship: He co-founded AT Energy, which was later acquired by HyPoint.
- Mentorship: Daniel is a mentor at Alchemist Accelerator, providing guidance to startups.1
- Angel Investing: He has invested in 6 deeptech startups as an angel investor.1
Education and Expertise
Daniel's educational background includes:
- Quantum Computing at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Radiophysics, Quantum Computers, AI, and Applied Information Technology at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
- Finance, Venture Capital, and Project Management at the Higher School of Economics
His areas of interest include AI/ML, Drones and Robotics, Energy Tech, Quantum Tech, and DevOps.
Notable Achievements
- Considered a pioneer of hydrogen energy in Eastern Europe
- Co-founder and former CEO of a hydrogen startup (now HyPoint) that was acquired by ZeroAvia in 20221
- Certified by the Corporate Finance Institute and a graduate of the Kauffman Fellowship course
- Authors the Deeptech Blog on Medium, sharing insights on technology trends1
Daniel Shaposhnikov's LinkedIn username is danilashaposhnikov, as confirmed by the query.2
Highlights
🚀 Excited to share my latest blog post! 🚀
In this post, I dive into the fascinating world of cutting-edge hydrogen extraction technologies. 💡
One technology that caught my attention is the relocation of steam methane reforming (SMR) into reservoirs. This innovative approach has the potential to repurpose aging oil and gas wells for hydrogen extraction, opening up new possibilities in energy production. However, SMR comes with its challenges, including complexities in controlling and maintaining combustion processes within the reservoir. Despite these hurdles, the promise of low-cost hydrogen production at scale is within reach.
But what if we could extract hydrogen directly from wells without SMR? Sounds like science fiction, right? Believe it or not, there's scientific evidence and real-world examples to back it up. This groundbreaking technology has the potential to revolutionize the way we extract hydrogen, offering a more sustainable and efficient solution. What's truly inspiring about this technology is the natural accumulation of hydrogen in wells over time. Unlike conventional hydrocarbons, hydrogen can quickly accumulate, potentially improving the economic viability of extraction projects. We're at the cusp of a new era in mineral extraction, and I'm excited to see where this journey takes us! 💼✨ #HydrogenExtraction #Innovation #Sustainability #MineralExtraction #EnergyTransition
In our latest report, I've chosen to dissect potential alternatives to lithium in the upcoming waves of energy storage technologies.
Key takeaways:
In the realm of mature ‘non-lithium’ alternatives, experts are highlighting sodium-ion technology. Despite its drawbacks including lower energy density (twice as poor as Li-Ion) and complexity in recycling, this technology won’t become the primary choice for electric vehicle and portable electronics manufacturers, who are the main consumers of energy storage solutions today. Sodium does have the advantage of being widely available. Notably, sodium batteries are in an early developmental stage and currently lag behind Li-Ion by a factor of 3 in terms of recharge cycle counts. Sodium batteries will find applications in scenarios where size constraints are absent.
In the burgeoning segment of grid-scale energy storage, lithium will face competition from sodium-ion, flow, and other battery types. Here, demands for weight and dimensions are less stringent, and charge-discharge cycles are more forgiving. This represents a potentially significant market where lithium technology will continue to dominate for the majority of energy storage solutions.
The most likely successor to Li-Ion is an improved lithium-based energy storage technology. Candidates in this category include lithium-cobalt-manganese batteries, boasting an energy density of around 300 Wh/kg. Substantial bets are also being placed on solid-state lithium-based battery technology, with energy densities exceeding 1000 Wh/kg in lab conditions. In my opinion, as well as that of several industry experts, over the next 30 years, only other lithium-based energy storage technologies will present serious competition to Li-Ion technology.
