Suggestions
Dave Boyce
All-in on PLG and AI-assisted GTM.
Dave Boyce is a seasoned technology executive with over 20 years of experience in leading SaaS companies and serving on multiple boards of directors, advisory boards, and non-profit boards.
Throughout his career, Dave has demonstrated his expertise in areas such as product development, marketing, sales, customer success, and corporate strategy.
He has a successful track record of selling companies to major players like Oracle, Amazon, and Aurea, as well as securing significant equity financing and managing large quotas.
Dave has also excelled in acquiring and integrating companies, launching new products, driving profitability through PLG/self-serve models, and restructuring organizations for growth.
As a leader, Dave has hired and managed hundreds of individuals, created substantial shareholder value, and achieved high growth rates for multiple companies.
Currently, Dave Boyce is fully dedicated to teaching, writing, investing, and advising in the tech industry, with a focus on go-to-market strategies, product-led growth, and customer success.
He serves as the Executive Chairman of Winning by Design, a board member at Forrester, and a professor at Brigham Young University's Marriott School of Business.
Dave is also in the process of publishing his first book on Product-led Growth with Stanford University Press, scheduled for release in 2025.
His mission is to mentor and empower the next generation of software leaders and entrepreneurs to drive value creation for customers and society.
Dave Boyce has an impressive educational background, including an MBA in Entrepreneurship from Harvard Business School, a BA with University Honors in German, Philosophy, and Business from Brigham Young University, and studies in Electrical and Electronics Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin.
He is known for his past roles at notable organizations like Oracle, Amazon, InsideSales.com, Fundly, and Forrester, where he held various executive positions. Dave's contributions have left a lasting impact on the tech industry.
Highlights
The #1 issue for SaaS CEOs right now is GTM Efficiency.
We are chasing it with everything we have. And it's no easier in the public markets than the private markets.
57% of Public SaaS companies are paying more than $2 for every $1 of incremental ARR, with several paying more than $4.
Those doing well are doing well (see chart in the linked paper for 10 public companies paying at or near $1).
But even more telling than the absolute numbers are the trends-- am I paying too much, but trending in the right direction? Or am I paying too much and trending in the wrong direction?
For the 257 SaaS companies poised to go public, and the 1,000+ right behind them, this is the biggest concern. "Can I get my GTM Efficiency right and trending in the right direction?"
🐶 Jacco van der Kooij and I published a paper on this topic, including data from David Spitz on current trends. Having worked with dozens of pre-IPO companies, we have seen the patterns of GTM Efficiency, and the current trends are not good.
What do we do about it? How can we systematically improve GTM efficiency and ensure sustainable growth? The answers lie in the concept of a Revenue Factory, with lots of learnings available from how Lean Manufacturing approaches continuous improvement.
Link to the paper in the comments.
XOXO,
-db
Winning by Design, Formative Ventures, BenchSights
"I knew that wasn't going to work."
I've been thinking about this phrase a lot. It helps no one. Not the person saying it, not the person hearing it, and not anyone it affects.
I have made made this mistake more than once. I could see what needed to be done, but then for whatever reason, I did something else--usually because I didn't want to hurt someone's feelings, or because it would have been too hard, or because I would have drawn criticism. And yet the situation played out as I expected, and the only thing I could do was admit, "I knew that wasn't going to work." Tragic.
An example is InsideSales. We committed to go upmarket and sell to larger, enterprise customers. In the process, we told ourselves enterprise was "better" than SMB. Since deal sizes were larger and retention rates were higher, we told ourselves we were being "data driven."
If anyone knew better, it should have been me. I had read and studied all of Clay Christensen's materials on disruptive innovation. I had worked directly with Clay on a business and returned to HBS to study with him. I knew the whole theory and roadmap of how innovators take a market from the bottom up, and how "smart" managers at incumbent companies, making "data-driven" decisions cede lower market segments one tier at a time until there is no higher ground left and they get squeezed out.
I knew all this, and yet we made the first decision, and then the second, and then the third... and to no one's surprise, the theory played out just as it appears in textbooks.
"I knew that wasn't going to work."
So why didn't you say anything?
The truth is, I did. But after a few appeals and being summarily shut down, I relented and went "native." I became part of the problem. Why? Because I didn't fight hard or long enough. I didn't throw a fit. I didn't lay down on the tracks. I didn't boycott. I didn't get unreasonable. I said, "I don't agree, and here's why" to several decisions that started layering on, and eventually I kind of just started going along with it, and then I kind of "owned" the strategy, and then I defended it.... but "I knew that wasn't going to work."
Who did I help by being a "nice guy?" No one. I should have been unreasonable. I should have been unrelenting. I should have waged a campaign and not given up until everyone could see it. I should not have given up and gone native.
In the end, if you see something and don't do anything about it because you "don't want to make trouble," or it would be "too hard," or you're being "outvoted," you're doing no one any favors.
When you feel like you see something clearly, act. Be insistent. Be true to your intuition. The clearer it is to you, the more important it is that you be true. I wish I had only seen this play out once, but I've seen it multiple times, and I've been the weak link multiple times.
So be courageous. Don't let "I knew that wouldn't work" be your only consolation prize.
XOXO,
-db
Winning by Design, Formative Ventures
