Suggestions
Denise DeLuca
Think Like Nature Guide || Founder, Wild Hazel || Adjunct Faculty, MA in Sustainable Design & MA in Creative Leadership at MCAD
Denise DeLuca is a multifaceted professional with expertise in sustainable design, biomimicry, and creative leadership. She is currently an Adjunct Faculty member in the MA in Creative Leadership program at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design (MCAD).32
Professional Background
DeLuca has a diverse background that includes:
- Founder of Wild Hazel: She established this organization, which appears to focus on sustainability and ecological thinking.12
- Former Director of MCAD's Sustainable Design Program: Before her current role, she led the Sustainable Design program at MCAD.3
- Co-founder of BCI: Biomimicry Creative for Innovation: This initiative likely combines biomimicry principles with innovative design practices.3
Academic Contributions
DeLuca's academic work is centered around sustainability and innovative design:
- Author: She wrote "Re-Aligning with Nature: Ecological Thinking for Radical Transformation," a book that explores how aligning with nature can lead to sustainable solutions for social and business challenges.1
- Educator: Besides her role in the Creative Leadership program, she also teaches in MCAD's MA in Sustainable Design program.6
Expertise and Focus Areas
DeLuca's work revolves around several key themes:
- Biomimicry: She is an advocate for using nature-inspired design solutions in innovation and sustainability.45
- Sustainable Design: Her expertise in this area is evident through her leadership and teaching roles at MCAD.37
- Creative Problem-Solving: She combines her engineering background with a passion for creative approaches to sustainability challenges.
Denise DeLuca's LinkedIn profile can be found under the username denise-deluca-4364b6b, where she describes herself as a "Think Like Nature Guide".4
Highlights
Self and Systems
“Someone who is self-centered or self-absorbed tends to be focused on themselves and may have difficulty showing consideration for others.” [https://lnkd.in/gveuHfKB]
If someone suggested that you’re self-centered or self-absorbed, you’d probably be offended. But our dominant cultural paradigm — what I’m calling the Conventional Paradigm — drives us to behave and make decisions as if we were exactly that. We believe we have to look out for number one, play the game and play to win, keep climbing. We post selfies and track likes.
It is natural, imperative even, that each of us look after our own self-interest. We need to take care of ourselves so we can be our best selves and contribute to the world in our own unique way. In Nature, when an organism acts in its own self interest, it does so in harmony with the system in which it participates. There is give and take, respect and reciprocity, synergy and balance. In an ecosystem, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
In our human constructs and culture, when we look after our own self-interest, it is with the intent of getting more from the system than we give, ideally much more. That’s how we accumulate wealth. We admire and celebrate those who are really good at getting more than they give. We choose to be intentionally ignorant of the negative impacts that acting in our own self-interest has on other living beings, human and otherwise. The “real world” is a negative sum game.
When we follow the Conventional Paradigm, we tend to be focused on ourselves and have difficulty showing consideration for others. We are self-centered and self-absorbed.
If that makes you cringe, know that there is an alternative and you likely practice it often — when you are living from your Natural Paradigm. When you are with those you love, you care as much or more about their welfare and happiness than your own. When you’re thoroughly enjoying a walk in the woods, you feel at one with Nature, not in competition with the trees and the birds. When you open the door and are greeted by the fresh smell of rain, you want to share that joy with others, not hoard it or expect people to admire you because you smelled it before they did.
When we follow our Natural Paradigm, we tend to be focused on others — our friends and family, our community, our society, Nature — and find it natural to show consideration for others. We are ecosystem-centered and absorbed in love of life.
—
If you’d like to explore your own Natural Paradigm, please request a free Tiny Transformation workbook [ https://lnkd.in/g3ABD9Xp ]. If you’re really curious, contact me and we can set up a time to chat.
#biomimicry #innerdevelopmentgoals #systemsthinking #thinklikenature Andy Middleton @JamieCreola Benjamin Freud, Ph.D.
Meaningful or Myopic and Misinformed?
When we care deeply about something, such as Nature, we feel a heightened sense of meaning, of purpose, of passion. We might feel clarity about what needs to be done, perhaps with a sense of urgency. These feelings can lead us to take meaningful action — or lead us to becoming myopic and misinformed. Our current dominant cultural paradigm — what I’m calling the Conventional Paradigm — is based on seeing the world with a mindset of scarcity, individuality, competition, greed, resistance, and fear. We can blame this mindset for the existential problems we’re facing. Unfortunately, many social and environmental activists — knowingly or not — adhere to this same paradigm — which leads to beliefs and actions that are myopic and misinformed rather than meaningful. We cannot address the existential crises we are facing by following the Conventional Paradigm. We might make positive changes here and there, but the bigger problems keep getting worse. Let’s look at forests as an example. We all love trees and forests. For many of us, the forest is our happy spot. And no one likes to see a forest that has been recently harvested. Accordingly, environmental activists often fight to stop the cutting of trees. They point to loss of wildlife habitat, soil erosion, or need for carbon sequestration. Those issues are meaningful, but viewed through the Conventional Paradigm, the resulting actions are myopic, misinformed, and ultimately harmful. For example, greed and fear lead us to protect trees in our own backyard (literally or figuratively); however, as long as the population continues to grow, so will the market for lumber, and trees will be harvested somewhere. If not in our own well-regulated, well-managed, and highly productive backyards, trees will be cut in places that lack protections and regulations and in areas where a greater number of species are at risk (like the Amazonian rainforest) resulting in backyard protection, but global harm. We point fingers at timber harvest, but most of us live in wood-framed homes filled with wood-based furniture. Forests and trees and wood are natural, can be replanted, and can be managed for multiple objectives including habitat. Harvesting trees for wood products is a net carbon sink. By contrast, the production of steel and concrete account for 15% of CO2 emissions, and mining permanently destroys ecosystems. What is meaningful and what is myopic and misinformed in the case of forestry? If you’re curious, I encourage you to listen to “It all starts in the soil” from the Forestry Smart Policy podcast series [https://lnkd.in/g5ruZaaQ]. After listening, think about how we might approach forestry and our own lives and impacts from Nature’s Paradigm. If you’d like to explore your own Natural Paradigm request a free Tiny Transformation workbook [https://lnkd.in/g3ABD9Xp].
#sustainability #forestry #biomimicry Jake Dailey Andy Middleton
