Suggestions
Elliot Seguin
Experimental Test Pilot (FW/RW)
Elliot Seguin is a highly experienced experimental test pilot, particularly known for his work in the development and testing of innovative aircraft. Here are some key points about his career and achievements:
Experience at Ampaire
Elliot Seguin has been an experimental test pilot at Ampaire, where he contributed significantly to the development of electric and hybrid aircraft. He was involved in the initial development of the electric/hybrid Skymaster aircraft and has been flight testing multiple generations of the AMP Drive suite of hybrid electric propulsion systems.23
Other Achievements
- He has designed, built, and tested several experimental aircraft, including three airplanes he personally built. He has also piloted 19 first flights and set 10 world records, six of which are FAI (Fédération Aéronautique Internationale) records.1
- Seguin has been working in the field of research and design of experimental aircraft since 2005.5
Current Activities
In addition to his work at Ampaire, Elliot Seguin is associated with Wasabi Air Racing and continues to be involved in the development and testing of exotic experimental aircraft, ensuring they transition safely and efficiently from the drawing board to flight.14
His LinkedIn profile, accessible under the username 'elliot-seguin-ba2a6434', provides more detailed insights into his professional background and achievements.
Highlights
⚡️🤨Will it spin?🤨⚡️
How spin resistant is spin resistant enough? How much performance are you willing to trade? Does “carefree” handling lead to broader safety concerns?
This is my favorite demo in the ICON Aircraft A5. With the stick all the way back, and the stall horn blaring I ask the student to make to turns resulting in 15 degrees of heading change in each direction.
Without fail this experience leaves a mark on the student, and every time I think of all the smart folks that worked so hard to make the aircraft so forgiving in this flight phase.
At Scaled Composites, LLC Burt used to talk about how during the Ez design evolution he had to consistently increase the fixed vertical tail area and shrink the movable vertical tail area to keep the Ez from spinning. It seemed publicly declaring the Ez to be spin proof not only encouraged builders to challenge it, but also resulted in a particularly nasty departure if you could get it to spin. The reality is with aileron and rudder, and especially with a driven lat/dir oscillation approach the question of how spin resistant is spin resistant enough becomes a legitimate discussion.
-Feet on pedals ball centered -Feet flat on the floor -Pro-spin pedal -Pro-spin pedal and stick -Drive the oscillation
The reality is the more poor behavior tolerance you build into the system, the more performance suffers. And at some point you need to climb and you need to cruise.
That being said I always wonder if perhaps this exceptional handling ends up creating dangerous pilot behavior. Could being so predictable in stall, and having such gorgeous control harmony through the rest of the envelope, actually be a problem? Could it inspire too much confidence? Is there such a thing as too good?
The Icon is a fascinating airplane and I am thoroughly impressed by the will it took to accomplish these excellent handling qualities. A very impressive product by an equally impressive team.
Have you flown an Icon? Did you love the Handling Qualities as much as I did? Do you think this discussion has merit?
airplanes are cool
#flighttest #spin #flatspin #departure #aircraft #handlingqualities #spinresistance #safety #aviation #testpilot
What should the control stick do?
"Stick forward to go forward" vs "Stick forward to go down" "Stick left to go left" vs "Stick left to turn left"
As we circle the role of the human in the next generation of highly automated VTOL vehicles, beyond the subtlety of transitions and specific control laws. Questions remain about even the most basic interaction with the control stick.
Figure 1: Unified inceptor mapping. Stick forward to go down, stick left to translate left (in hover).
Figure 2: EZ Fly mapping. Stick forward to go down, stick left to turn left (in hover).
Figure 3: Helo-centric mapping. Stick forward to go forward, stick left to translate left (in hover).
Which is your mapping is your favorite?
How do you think the "right" answer will be found?
The control layouts shown are from Marco Lotterio, Andrea Pingitore and Gabriele Di Francesco's "Means of compliance paper" linked below.
https://lnkd.in/gEHQWVwU
#hover #flightcontrols #controlstick #testpilot #controllaw #aviation #VTOL #EVTOL #pilot #testpilot #simplifiedvehicleoperation #ezfly #unifiedcontrol #VAACharrier #f35 #mte #hqte
