Suggestions
Erik von Stackelberg
Head of Design at Halo
Erik von Stackelberg is a design leader currently serving as the Head of Design at Halo, a social impact startup. Here are some key points about him:
- Professional Role: He is the Head of Design at Halo, a company that connects scientists with industry to drive innovation and positive change.4
- Background: Erik has a deep commitment to servant leadership and building effective teams.1
- Education: He holds a degree from The University of Western Ontario.1
- Professional Interests: Erik is active in the design and leadership community, often sharing recommendations and insights on design, leadership, and technology on his LinkedIn profile. For example, he has recommended Ethan Mollick's Substack for separating signal from noise in the field.2
- Collaboration and Innovation: He emphasizes the collaboration between different departments, such as computer science and product/design, highlighting their synergy at Halo.5
- Recent Activities: Erik has been involved in various projects, including working with AI tools like Gemini 1.5 Advanced to enhance synthesis and productivity.3
Highlights
Hi everyone! I may have the need to add an American product designer to the Halo team in the next few months. My design network is almost entirely Canadian, so I'm hoping to make some new connections.
For context, if we proceed with the role, it would be for an intermediate/senior practitioner (4-5 years of experience.)
If anyone has a contact or two in mind whom I could connect with, please let me know! Thank you! :)
Looking to model responsible AI use at work? Here's an idea I had (maybe others have already had it... what's original these days?)
I've started adding an "AI disclosure" to everything I share when I use AI to summarize/generate/polish/etc. It uses this format:
AI Disclosure: [Noun][Verb'd] by [Model]. Reviewed by [Name].
Examples: AI Disclosure: Notes summarized by GPT3.5. Reviewed by Erik. AI Disclosure: Insights generated by GPT4. Reviewed by Erik. AI Disclosure: Draft discussion guide generated by GPT4. Reviewed by Erik.
That's it! Now, when someone is reading a research report, interview notes, a meeting summary, etc., they can feel confident knowing that it's accurate (someone didn't just use AI, copy/paste, and call it a hallucinatory day) but also authentic (I'm not pretending I wrote it).
It's not unlike citing your sources. It always bothers me when people give a talk or write a post about a well-documented concept and act like they invented it. Citation doesn't undermine the value of your work—it helps people learn even more. To that end, you could go further and share the prompts you've used, but a simple AI disclosure takes no time to add.
With the proliferation of "Rewrite with AI," I think disclosures or watermarking could also be a key trust-building mechanism for team members: If I always use the disclosure, you'll know if content comes purely from my brain when the disclosure is absent. And when I do use it—much like an 'edited' stamp proves a post has changed—the disclosure assures people they're not being duped.
AI Disclosure: No AIs were used (or harmed) in the writing of this post :P
