Sign In

George Spencer

Senior Managing Director Seyen Capital

George Spencer is a prominent venture capitalist based in Chicago, with a focus on IT investments. With an exceptional track record, he has achieved an average return of 6X over a span of 25 years, a remarkable 5X since 2001. His portfolio includes successful ventures such as Knightsbridge, CBeyond, Synchronoss, SPS Commerce, Convio, Vubiquity, Borderfree, and Autism Home Support Services. Currently, he is engaged in deals with Cybera, LaunchPoint, GoHealth, Knowledge Hound, DataCubes, PowerPost, TrueData, and Reconstruct. George Spencer holds an MBA from The Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, a BA in Economics from Amherst College, and has foundations from St. Mark's School of Texas. Throughout his career, he has held key roles in various organizations such as Sustain.Life, TeleTeachers, PursueCare, Convr, Seyen Capital, KnowledgeHound, Digi-Data, LaunchPoint, Cybera, Convio, Borderfree, SPS Commerce, Adams Street Partners, Knightsbridge, JK&B Capital, and Braxton Associates.

Highlights

Jan 8 · linkedin

https://lnkd.in/exKpV4e5

Happy to announce the sale of Knowledge Hound to YouGov. Special thanks to the leadership of CEO Laura Baker and the resilience of Sierra Hinson; Julie Levenson; @JeffPatt; and the rest of the KH team.

Mar 11 · linkedin

I don’t post a lot of personal opinions on this so forgive me in advance and brace yourself. Otherwise swipe on…

So ….basically SVB fails not because of bad loans but because deposits tripled since 2019. The bank went out the yield curve and bought t bills and cmos with those deposits. Deposit levels depreciated as tech companies burned cash and subsequent rounds of financing did not replace that cash. In order to raise liquidity SVB has to sell those assets they had purchased in a lower interest rate environment by selling this same T bills and cmos at a loss.

Soo…the bank was taking deposits lending to the government and then the Fed does not step in and make them whole on the debt thereby mitigating the crisis

I wonder how many other banks did this and are in the same situation minus the concentration of cash burning depositors.

It certainly raises a lot of questions about the circularity of liquidity we have in this economy. Which is a big question that I don’t know the answer to yet. The other obvious one question is how the fed did not understand that this was a risk of the rapid rise in rates and have plans in place to mitigate the problem like buying back the debt.

I guess you could argue that the Fed did understand the risk and that the failure of SVB was an intentional way of taking liquidity out of the system and steam out of the economic engine of the economy which in turn lowers inflation.

The better answer probably is they had not fully considered and didn’t understand the risk as they raised rates.

While this could have been avoided if SVB had properly matched liquidity with duration I am willing to bet their behavior was pretty typical of the entire banking system and that the initial sin lies with the monetary and fiscal policies of the last 4 years. And the fallout is the result of the fed not anticipating the situation that it created. We will see what Monday brings.

George Spencer
Add to my network

Location

Greater Chicago Area