Sign In

Hugo Amsellem

Advisor at Keli Network Inc.

Building a Creator Accelerator at http://JellySmack.com & Writing about the Creator Economy at http://ArmTheCreators.com 💪

Highlights

Oct 30 · twitter

https://t.co/WT1K2pVe3i https://t.co/BCbzrPVDGw

https://t.co/WT1K2pVe3i https://t.co/BCbzrPVDGw
Oct 16 · twitter

sci-fi is coming WAY faster than expected. the bits exponential is hitting atoms & cells and we're gonna get 100 years of sci-fi in 5.

the tech is (almost) the easy part lol but getting THE PUBLIC on board is the hard part when you live in a democracy.

humans are not the problem, they adapt absurdly fast -put your grandmother in a waymo, she's bored after 36 seconds. nobody needs a narrative once they've touched the thing (twss).

but two things don't adapt that fast:

  1. institutions. regulation, permitting, litigation - every layer built to protect the public also delays the moment the public actually touches the tech. and in that gap, w/ nothing real to hold, people fantasize. negatively (cc @PessimistsArc). you can't be scared of a waymo you've ridden. you can be terrified of one you've only read about.

  2. culture. culture is collective sense-making, a society agreeing on what smth means, and that's slow & linear. the internet made information exponential and meaning chaotic - it behaves like weather now: emergent, bottom-up, unpredictable. faster info didn't make us agree faster on what things mean.

so the tech/culture gap keeps growing because tech is exponential but culture is not, and in the west that's dangerous bc our OS is democratic: the public HAS to be on board or they vote against it, institutions slow down even more, gap widens.

china has a different answer: zero friction on deployment, the public touches tech everywhere, narrative is positive. it works. but the story is top-down - polished, partially true, fragile. matter & meaning have to emerge bottom-up or the system explodes later. and in the meantime they get to use our open DNA against us: fake news on data centers, every public fear amplified. we can't do that back, and we don't have time to wait for the long term to prove us right.

what we have instead: a guy on a stage w/ real hardware, in public, where everything can fuck up. no editing, skin in the game, millions who saw it w/ their own eyes and nobody told them what to think. that's how sense-making works in a democracy.

non-bullshit narrative capital might be our best weapon in the race towards the future. we need a lot more of it, from a lot more founders, and we need institutions to stop standing between the public and the thing.

(sorry for the vomit session, i'm flying back to SF and got half inspired).

Related Questions

What inspired Hugo Amsellem to start Intuition?
How does Intuition's approach to venture capital differ from others?
What are some successful startups backed by Intuition?
How does Hugo Amsellem's background in the music industry influence his investment strategy?
What are the key sectors Intuition focuses on?
Hugo Amsellem
Add to my network

Experience

Advisor at Keli Network Inc.
Angel Investor at Angel Investor

Education

Lycée Saint Charles
Lycée St Charles
San Francisco State University
Entrepreneurial Studies, Entrepreneurship, Sciences Po
Bachelors In Business, San Francisco State University, Lam Family College Of Business
Masters In Marketing, Istec - Ecole Supérieure De Commerce Et De Marketing
Master Of Science In Management, Skema Business School

Location

Paris, ÃŽle-De-France, France