Sign In

Johan Brand

Founder @ Kahoot! & We Are Human - Chief Entrepreneur hos EntrepreneurShipOne

Johan Brand is a creative technology entrepreneur and investor based in Oslo, Norway. He is recognized as a founding partner at We Are Human, a company focused on leveraging technology for social impact and inclusivity in education. His contributions to the field have earned him several accolades, including:

  • Founder of the Year from the Norwegian Nordic Startup Awards in May 2015.
  • Digital Leader of the Year awarded by E24.no in November 2015.
  • Induction into the Hall of Fame at Edinburgh Napier University’s School of Arts and Creative Industries in May 2023, recognizing his significant professional contributions.

Brand's work emphasizes creating inclusive environments, particularly in educational settings, and he has been influential in promoting innovative solutions that enhance learning experiences.1

Highlights

Sep 10 · linkedin

“We strongly believe that traditional venture capital funding has its limitations when it comes to making a genuine societal impact, especially on a systemic level. We want to fill that gap….”

Thats why we invest time and resources to build #frameworks and #tools for the alignment of companies with people, planet and society together with our partner 2050, knowing the impact it has, based on our past experience with Norwegian Design Council & The Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design on Inclusive Design (people centred innovation strategy). A core building block of Kahoot!s success.

That’s why we foster a #seagrass community for the blue economy: Jamie Brooker Sindre Østgård Tim Moore Paul Alexandrou Elida Midttun Berg Synnøve Marie Kvam Strømsvåg Christine Spiten Catharina Frostad Pia Ve Dahlen

That’s why we invest as #LP’s in a portfolio of up and coming VC funds trying to make a dent: Unconventional Ventures Norselab Skyfall Ventures Sondo Capital Giant Ventures Katapult and some heavy hitters with the right mindset such as Atomico.

That’s why we invest directly in founders taking on systemic change such as Paebbl, Variable, Brim Explorer, Strise, Lexolve, WeWillWrite, Ludenso, Genially etc etc

Ingjerd Jevnaker Straand Rama Gheerawo Victoria Høisæther Kristian Paulsen

Jun 12 · linkedin

Back in 1949, George Orwell was already predicting algorithmic content in his best-known novel, "1984:"

“There was a whole chain of separate departments dealing with proletarian literature, music, drama, and entertainment generally. Here were produced rubbishy newspapers containing almost nothing except sport, crime, and astrology, sensational five-cent novelettes, films oozing with sex, and sentimental songs which were composed entirely by mechanical means on a special kind of kaleidoscope known as a versificator.”

A “versificator.” It’s not all that different from a lot of what we’re seeing emerge these days.

While AI can be terribly clever, everyone can already spot the problem with it.

A machine is not going to create Lawrence Of Arabia.

A machine is not going to create the Grosse Fugue.

A machine is not going to create Guernica.

A machine is not going to create Crime And Punishment.

A machine is not going to create the Sagrada Familia.

There’s many reasons why that is, but here is a big one:

Because the machine doesn’t care.

We do.

The billionaire investor and co-founder of PayPal, Peter Thiel, made headlines recently when, during an interview, he said that AI was going to disrupt a helluva lot of industries, making math-skills far less valuable, and verbal skills, much more so.

“It’s going to be much worse for math people than word people… People have told me that in the next 3-5 years, AI will be able to solve all the US Maths Olympiad problems. That would shift things quite a bit.”

Who would’ve guessed a decade ago that the “Learn To Code” meme could actually end up being terrible advice?

Logically this should not come as a surprise. Code doesn’t care who wrote it.

As a fellow named Bechir Trabelsi remarked over on LinkedIn, Apple didn’t become the world’s biggest company because it could hire better coders than its competitors (far from it), it did so because it could touch the human heart better than any of them.

Or another way of putting it, machines are very good at solving PROBLEMS, but not very good for solving THE PROBLEM.

THE PROBLEM of being alive. The problem of being conscious in the universe. That is what art is for. That is what connection is for. That is what leadership is for.

The future belongs to the people who can actually tell the difference.

Read original here: > https://lnkd.in/d3FKwwbN

Related Questions

What inspired Johan Brand to start We Are Human?
What are some notable projects Johan Brand has worked on at We Are Human?
How did Johan Brand achieve the title of "Founder of the Year"?
What is the mission of Johan Brand Leadership Advisory DWC-LLC?
How has Johan Brand's work impacted the creative technology industry?
Johan Brand
Johan Brand, photo 1
Johan Brand, photo 2
Add to my network

Location

Oslo, Oslo, Norway