Suggestions
Jonathan Rothwell
Principal Economist at Gallup, Author, and Senior Fellow at Brookings Institution
Jonathan Rothwell is the Principal Economist at Gallup, where he has worked since March 2016.5 In this role, he researches and publishes on a wide range of social science topics, advises Gallup clients and associates on research questions and economic analysis, and helps develop new Gallup surveys.5
Background and Education
Rothwell holds a Ph.D. from Princeton University's School of Public and International Affairs.24 He also has a master's degree in economics from the New School, a master's in clinical psychology from Duquesne University, and a bachelor's degree in psychology with a biological and evolutionary concentration from Pennsylvania State University.2
Career Highlights
Before joining Gallup, Rothwell was a fellow at the Brookings Institution's Metropolitan Policy Program from 2009 to 2016.25 He currently maintains a position as a nonresident senior fellow at Brookings.2 Additionally, he is a visiting scholar at the George Washington University Public Policy Institute.12
Research and Publications
Rothwell's areas of expertise include:
- Higher education
- Labor economics
- Economic growth
- Trade
- Innovation
- Social and economic inequality
- Voting behavior
- Urban economic development1
He has published numerous scholarly articles and contributed to various high-profile outlets. In 2019, Rothwell published a book with Princeton University Press titled "A Republic of Equals: A Manifesto for a Just Society," which examines the fundamental causes of income inequality.12
Rothwell has also been a contributor to The New York Times' Upshot column, providing economic analysis and insights.13 His research at Gallup has covered topics such as presidential candidate support, U.S. productivity growth, trade competition effects, and college assessment methods.25
Current Work
At Gallup, Rothwell continues to conduct research on various social and economic issues. He advises on major research initiatives for Gallup clients, particularly in areas such as macroeconomics, entrepreneurship, labor economics, race relationships, and higher education.1 His recent work focuses on topics like the mental health effects of parenting practices, entrepreneurial personality and management practices, and measuring systemic discrimination.2
Highlights
In a new post with my colleague Frank Newport, I find that 85 years of Gallup data show how and when marriage behavior and attitudes began to diverge according to partisan identity.
Given my work on parenting, social media, and adolescent mental health, I read Jonathan Haidt's new book with great interest. I wrote up my thoughts here. Main points: 1) I totally agree with Haidt that social media diverts energy/attention from healthier activities, is quasi-addictive, and ultimately should be restricted/limited in ways he suggests. He establishes a very sound framework for understanding why this is so and reviews the evidence fairly, with clarity and insight. 2) I also believe he downplays all of the other and more important causes of teen mental health. I reckon that social media explains <1% of the level of teen mental health and 3-6% (max) of the change since 2010. Parent-child relationships are far more important, theoretically and empirically, but almost entirely ignored in his book. His main complaint about parents is that we over-protect in the real world and under-protect in the virtual world, discouraging play in favor of sitting at home and looking at screens. Every parent I know makes efforts to encourage play and sports, and the data suggest that sports participation and physical activity have not declined in the smartphone age. On the other hand, parenting has changed quite a lot in the last 50 years: Parents are less religious, more solitary, less supported by other adults, and more likely to be working. Could that affect the quality of teen-parent relations--and teen mental health? It seems reason to think it might.
