Suggestions
Josef Filipowicz
Director of Policy, Office of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
Josef Filipowicz is an expert in urban and regional policy with ten years of experience in multiple sectors including think tanks, government, and consulting.
He holds a Master of Arts (MA) in Political Science from Wilfrid Laurier University, a Bachelor of Urban and Regional Planning from Ryerson University, and a Professional Certificate in Municipal Finance from the Harris School of Public Policy at the University of Chicago.
Josef has held key positions such as Director of Policy at the Office of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Independent Policy Researcher/Consultant, Specialist in Policy Analysis at Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), Senior Policy Analyst, Policy Analyst, Researcher, and Research Intern at The Fraser Institute.
Highlights
Ontario’s Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Paul Calandra recently announced the release of the Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) at the 2024 Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Conference. Though not widely known, the PPS is a pretty big deal for housing supply and affordability.
Essentially, the PPS governs land-use planning across Canada’s biggest province and its 444 municipalities. And as many communities face unprecedented growth pressures, high interest rates, and the resulting challenges to housing affordability it’s hard to overstate the impact the PPS will have on Ontario’s growth.
Some highlights (among many):
𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗺𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴: Municipalities across Ontario have experienced a lot more population growth than they anticipated, especially in recent years. Under the new PPS, municipalities will now plan for 20 to 30 years of growth using forecasts from the Ministry of Finance. In practice this means more accuracy and consistency in the way they plan for the many more homes and businesses Ontario needs.
𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀: The new PPS consolidates and streamlines the previous PPS and A Place to Grow, the plan that has guided growth around Toronto for two decades. Notably, their combined page count is reduced by over 100 pages and 30,000 words, saving municipal staff and homebuilders (small, large, not-for-profit, for-profit) countless hours.
𝗔 𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀: Many might be surprised to learn that municipalities could only designate additional underutilized lands every five or so years for conversions (e.g. office parks and rural lots at the edge of the city converted to mixed-use and residential). These redesignations can now occur at any time, meaning communities are more nimble in addressing shortages of residential, commercial, or industrial lands in real time.
In short, the speed, scale, and type of growth communities will plan for is directly impacted by the policy direction laid out in the PPS. Municipalities’ newfound flexibility should remove some major obstacles to achieving the ambitious targets they need to meet in order to restore broad affordability provincewide.
Kudos to all the folks involved in the preparation and roll-out of the PPS over more than two years. Their efforts should pay dividends for Ontarians for years to come.
#AMO2024 #ONpoli #housing
Thanks to the Ontario 360 project at the University of Toronto - Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy for publishing work Steve Lafleur and I have been doing on housing stock growth in the Greater Toronto Area.
As the map here shows, the geographic distribution of housing stock growth between 2016 and 2021 was highly concentrated in the GTA’s core—within a three-kilometre radius of Union Station—and on the urban fringe. This “donut” pattern of growth has several policy implications as the region attempts to overcome a generational housing shortage.
First, slow-growing central neighbourhoods and communities can accommodate a lot more housing, given the GTA’s severe shortage and demonstrated demand. In fact, most GTA neighbourhoods barely grew, or even lost housing.
Second, the steep decline in housing stock growth immediately outside the regional core (Downtown Toronto) is a strong indication of policy barriers to homebuilding in otherwise highly desirable neighbourhoods, rather than implying weaker demand to live there.
Third, faster-growing pockets in more distant communities are partially reflective of deliberate efforts to develop additional nodes of transport and commerce beyond the regional core, but could also be the result of insufficient homebuilding in desirable central neighbourhoods.
Faster housing stock growth Downtown and in select outlying districts plays an important role in closing the gap between demand and supply, but given the magnitude of unmet need for housing in Canada’s largest urban region and primary port of entry, all governments with influence on housing development in the GTA have a role to play in enabling the construction of more homes across more neighbourhoods and communities.
The full report is available here: https://lnkd.in/egkQDbkm
