Suggestions
Justin Lane
CTO at ALAN Analytics s.r.o and consultant at InoBat
Justin Lane is a knowledgeable mind hacker and consultant with a keen focus on the intersection of cognitive science and technology to drive AI advancements. Holding a doctoral degree from Oxford University, Justin is currently located in Bratislava, Slovakia. With a rich educational background that includes studies at prestigious institutions like the University of Oxford, Queen's University Belfast, and the University of Vermont, he brings a depth of knowledge to his work.
Highlights
To the "General AI is near" folks: Calm down! 😺 AGI isn't coming this year. GPT-5 won't be AGI. #sorrynotsorry 😥 Here's why: 🧠 AI in the last 18 months has done a good job at replicating just these two white areas of the brain in the picture: the part that understands what you're saying, and the part that produces what needs to be said. 🧠 It has BARELY touched basic reasoning and logic. Outside of the work done at CulturePulse almost no work in AI has addressed social and cultural areas of AI (which is why AI sounds so lame, boring, and similar-because it has no culture). 🧠 Combined, we're not even at 10% of the human brain here. 90% remains undiscovered and isn't (yet?) modeled by machine learning.
So no, AGI isn't coming next year, it isn't going to put you in a human zoo... not yet.
#ai #innovation #tech #agi #gpt #gpt5 #gpt40 #llm #culture #society #socialissues #aiforgood
Something to think about: “There is no time in history where the people censoring speech were the good guys.”
In my opinion this is only one side of the debate. But for me, the other side of the debate is not censorship or exceptions. When you say "but" everything before that becomes erased. "I believe in free speech but..." guarantees that what follows will be examples of the kinds of speech they think shouldn't be free.
The other side of this debate for me is: "Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." You can allow people to say things online that you dislike, let them do it. Let it be tracked, let it be analyzed. The only thing more dangerous than a threat to society on social media, is the threat to society you didn't see coming and couldn't prepare for. Censorship of free speech and political opinions isn't making us more safe. Its making us more polarized and more exposed to social level threats. There is another way...
https://lnkd.in/g7uxBUC9
