Suggestions
Matthew Carpenter-Arevalo
Ex-Google / Ex-Twitter / Performance-Based Marketing
Professional Background
Matthew Carpenter-Arévalo is a distinguished Canadian-Ecuadorian entrepreneur, author, and digital marketing strategist known for his multifaceted approach to leadership and innovation in digital marketing. As the founder and CEO of Centrico Digital, Matthew has successfully established a managed marketing services company that caters to a diverse clientele across North and Latin America. His work not only focuses on providing exceptional marketing solutions but also emphasizes the importance of cultural sensitivity in international business.
With a rich professional portfolio, Matthew has held prominent positions at some of the world's leading technology and economic organizations. Notably, he served as a manager at Google, where his contributions to the Online Partnerships Group were pivotal in driving digital strategies that resonate with audiences across various demographics. Similarly, his tenure at Twitter as the Latin America Partner Manager allowed him to forge critical partnerships and enhance the brand's connection with Spanish-speaking users, further solidifying his reputation as an industry leader.
In addition to his roles at tech giants, Matthew has made significant contributions to the World Economic Forum as the Senior Manager and Head of Latin America for Global Shapers. This role showcased his commitment to fostering economic growth and social impact throughout the region by empowering young leaders and driving collaborative initiatives.
Education and Achievements
Matthew's academic journey is as impressive as his professional one. His scholarly pursuits led him to the University of Oxford, where he earned a Master of Philosophy (MPhil) degree in Modern and Medieval Languages. This prestigious program honed his linguistic prowess and equipped him with the skills necessary to bridge cultural gaps effectively.
Before his studies at Oxford, Matthew completed his Bachelor's degree in English and Spanish Literature at St. Thomas University in Canada. This solid educational foundation has been instrumental in shaping his career, allowing him to communicate fluently in both languages and write compellingly on diverse topics, including technology, culture, and politics. His articles have been published in respected platforms such as TechCrunch, TheNextWeb, and Gk.City, highlighting his expertise and thought leadership in the digital space.
Achievements
As a Rhodes Scholar, Matthew Carpenter-Arévalo is part of an esteemed group of individuals recognized worldwide for their academic excellence and leadership potential. This honor is a testament to his dedication to academic and professional achievement. His entrepreneurial journey with Centrico Digital exemplifies his ability to identify market needs and provide tailored solutions that resonate with clients.
Matthew's extensive experience in digital marketing is underscored by his strategic foresight and innovative mindset. His work at Centrico Digital not only emphasizes the digital aspect of marketing but also integrates cultural understanding, making him a sought-after speaker and consultant in the marketing domain. He continues to inspire up-and-coming entrepreneurs and marketers by sharing his insights and experiences across various platforms, fostering a sense of community and collaboration.
As he continues to navigate the rapidly evolving landscape of technology and marketing, Matthew Carpenter-Arévalo remains a pivotal figure for those interested in the intersections of culture, technology, and international business. Through his ongoing projects and thought leadership, he champions the opportunities that lie in harnessing digital tools for positive change and growth.
Highlights
I get a little triggered whenever I see environmental NGOs in the global north opposing carbon credits.
After all, without carbon credits, we have no plan for forests, no plan for carbon removal, and we offer the global south what I call the Green Sh!tty deal, and it goes like this:
The unstated expectation is that countries like Ecuador, where I live, should throttle their emissions while continuing to meet their populations' outstanding needs and aspirations.
At the same time, they must protect their vast forests and mangroves, which deliver ecosystem services/benefits to the entire planet. They must do so for free, absorbing the costs of the global north's pollution-driven development.
To boot, the country probably has an agreement with the IMF to enforce fiscal austerity, and it's likely dealing with some serious drug-fueled security issues along with illegal mining, which is driving deforestation and polluting waterways. Oh yeah, the global north demands minerals for its wind and solar projects and lithium for its batteries, but unless your government is anti-mining, frankly, your government is the enemy of the global environmental movement.
If the green sh!tty deal makes you uncomfortable, it should. Solving climate change while enabling development is complex and includes some not-great trade-offs.
Some might say the solution is for governments in the north to compensate governments in the south, but countries in the south know better than to pin their hopes on the arrival of that check. In Latin America, most school-aged children read Garcia Marquez's novella "El Coronel No Tiene Quien Quien Le Escriba", about an old man waiting to receive his military pension after heroically serving in a war. Spoiler alert: it never comes.
Carbon credits represent an imperfect but evolving proposal for complementary climate action.
When used correctly, high-quality carbon credits do not replace decarbonization efforts but instead are a means to take responsibility for emissions that are present today but won't be mitigated until tomorrow. That's why indigenous groups like the Peoples Forests Partnership (PFP) are urging SBTi to consider how to use credits to maximize decarbonization and regeneration.
Too many environmental activists don't want to wrestle with the complexity of decarbonization or the unintended consequences of their policy stances. Instead, they prefer to hold signs, yell slogans, and expect others to figure out the details. They claim to speak for indigenous peoples, but they won't listen to them.
So here's my suggestion: if you're an environmentalist publicly opposing climate action, consider whether you've got all the facts and are approaching the exercise with an open mind. Maybe try talking to someone who disagrees with you. If you're unswayed, propose an alternative. We must move on from environmentalism as only opposition toward environmentalism as proposition.
Over the years here in Ecuador, I have had the good fortune to see up close the work done by tireless forest advocates like Carolina Proaño Castro at Fundación Futuro and my good friend Garrett Siegers at Whole Forest.
If you talk to them about their front-line work in what remains of Ecuador's Chocó forest as well as its Andean forest, they'll tell you that, for small landholders, trees are like a savings account.
One of their kids needs school clothes? They chop down a tree. Unexpected medical expenses? They chop down a tree. In some parts of Northern Ecuador, communities are so poor that they'll harvest trees like teak as soon as they can, even if leaving those trees in the ground for a few more years until maturity will massively increase their yield.
So here's the uncomfortable truth: for most of the countries in the Amazon basin, small-scale farmers are driving deforestation and degradation. How do we get them to stop?
We pay them not to.
In Ecuador, the minimum wage is just below $500 a month, but many people live on wages well below that amount. In other words, it costs very little to change people's behavior from degrading their environment to protecting it, and the social impact can be huge.
When we look at the pushback on carbon credits, almost all of the voices that are against them come from the global north, and their primary concern is greenwashing.
When we look at who is in favor of carbon credits, the voices are overwhelmingly from the global south. Yes, they often don't have as big a microphone as their minority counterparts in the north, but they are willing to fight for a type of capitalism that does not require we sacrifice our natural inheritance for development. Our forests in Latin America are home to 40% of the world's biodiversity, and yesterday's toolkit of charity and government promises is not enough for the task at hand. Carbon credits are our generational opportunity to do just that.
As always, the devil is in the details, and we're still figuring them out.
Right now, it's hard for small landholders to participate in carbon projects.
Innovators like Josh Knauer at ReSeed.farm, Luke Schubert and the team at Open Forest Protocol, and Florian Reber and the team at Chloris Geospatial, to name a few, are working hard to make carbon credits a revenue stream for farmers and an integral commodity for companies. We need more investment and entrepreneurship dedicated to this task because the one thing we're short on is time.
I understand the arguments of those concerned about greenwashing; they're not wrong to be skeptical. Where I disagree is their narrow mindset in which carbon credits and decarbonization are mutually exclusive; they're not.
We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to change the flow of the river of capitalism in the global south. We're going to keep fighting.

