Sign In

Matthew Digesti

Web3 Identity | Fintech | Crypto - Corporate, Product & Regulatory Strategy Executive

Matthew Digesti is the Vice President of Fintech & Digital Asset Technologies at Blockchains, Inc.4 He is a lawyer who has received notable recognition in his field. In 2016, he was named Lawyer of the Year in Reno by the Reno News & Review, being the only general counsel selected in Northern Nevada for this prestigious award.1

Digesti's expertise spans various areas of law, including banking, business, contracts, corporate law, finance, intellectual property, internet law, and litigation.5 His role at Blockchains, Inc. involves assisting in leading product strategy for embedded digital technologies.4

In addition to his professional accomplishments, Digesti is active on LinkedIn, where he frequently shares insights on technological advancements, regulatory matters, and legal developments. He has commented on topics such as DeFi risks and regulations2, as well as the evolution of internet technologies in advanced countries.3

Highlights

Jul 7 · linkedin

The famous quote "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win” originated with Mahatma Gandhi. Or so people thought until the attribution was debunked. Still a good quote though and somewhat applicable to where blockchain finds itself today.

The Federal Reserve of New York, SWIFT, and more than a dozen big name financial institutions released a report on a proof of concept payments system that tokenizes US dollar deposits. What were the findings? Blockchain technology could be used to develop a near-instant 24-hour global payment system using U.S. dollars. The study concluded that such a system “could benefit global users of USD as an international payment currency and may represent a progression from real-time domestic USD payments to a global, real-time USD payments operation,” according to an overview of the report.

One lesson I have learned in regulated emerging technology land is this - Don't listen to what people say as much as watch what they do. Our government is engaging in public private POCs at the highest levels to integrate blockchain technology with wholesale and retail banking payment rails. This is a big deal. Obvious to anyone closely watching, but a big deal indeed.

First they ignored blockchain. Then they laughed at it. But this is where the quote took a turn. Third, they didn't fight blockchain technology (regulators are certainly fighting the financial implementations of blockchain, but not the technology). Instead, they quietly began experimenting with it while waiting for the crypto elite to put a bullet in their own heads. You see, they knew the ecosystem was not sustainable, was ripe with fraud, and the house of cards would eventually collapse under its own greedy weight. The question now becomes, and the most important question of all is, who will win?

Blockchain is a neutral technology. It can take many forms along the spectrum of centralized on one end to decentralized on the other. The question of who will win is critical because who wins will dictate whether the promise of blockchain technology is realized. There are a lot of us building to ensure self-sovereignty and privacy for the individual while there are a lot of organizations trying to build bigger moats around their fiefdom. While progress is needed, the wrong type of progress in blockchain is basically no progress at all.

So, who will win? It's the trillion-dollar question.

(Report can be found here - https://lnkd.in/gqYSnPzb)

Jun 28 · linkedin

Being a life-long homer, it's tough seeing a Nevada-based crypto company fail so spectacularly, especially when customer funds were lost.

The allegations are in the petition (linked below). Read it for yourself.

Rumors have been well-known in the industry for a long time that Prime Trust's failure was coming. They played regulatory arbitrage with a state trust charter and offered services that trusts simply are not allowed to offer.

Prime Trust was successful not because they were the best, but because they filled a huge need in the ecosystem by giving fintechs indirect access to banking when those fintechs could not get direct access themselves. Beyond that, they simply aggregated and orchestrated a bunch of vendor tech. But their risk management was so poor, they literally lost access to at least one wallet with a significant client crypto balance because they lost a private key. Rather than coming clean, it looks as though they tried to cover it up for many many months. This is not a reflection of the Nevada crypto ecosystem or the work that so many have put in to make Nevada a crypto destination.

I know how the honest and thoughtful operators in this space work, how obsessed they are with customer protections, and how programs are built to ensure, to a high degree of probability, that something as basic as private key management is not messed up. There are a lot of these people working quietly to build something special, including us. A better and safer crypto experience is coming.

Related Questions

What are Matthew Digesti's key achievements at Blockchains, Inc?
How did Matthew Digesti transition from legal to fintech roles?
What are Matthew Digesti's views on the future of digital assets?
What impact has Matthew Digesti had on Nevada's legal landscape?
How does Matthew Digesti contribute to Blockchains, Inc.'s product strategy?
Matthew Digesti
Matthew Digesti, photo 1
Matthew Digesti, photo 2
Add to my network

Location

Reno, Nevada, United States