Suggestions
Max Pixel
Cutting-edge, high-performance interactive media frameworks & solutions
Based on the available information, here's what we know about Max Pixel:
Max Pixel is a Principal Systems Architect working at BODS. As a creative systems architect, he orchestrates software and workflows to accomplish various tasks.1
Some key details about Max Pixel:
- Current Position: Principal Systems Architect at BODS
- LinkedIn Username: max-pixel-91b02468
- Education: Attended University of Southern California1
Regarding his work history:
- He has been working as a Principal Systems Architect at BODS for approximately 488 days (as of the date of the search result)
- On average, Max tends to work for a company for about 3 years and 2 months2
While the available information doesn't provide extensive details about Max Pixel's specific responsibilities or achievements, his role as a Principal Systems Architect likely involves high-level system design, architecture planning, and technical leadership within BODS.
It's worth noting that the information available is limited, and there may be more recent updates to Max Pixel's career or position that are not reflected in these search results.
Highlights
“People also have the ridiculous notion that technology will improve our standard of living by giving us more free time. The only problem is that everything we can do in our free time will be made completely obsolete by the technology we cherish so much. Take, for example, that wonderful pastime, quilting. While Grandma can produce an excellent-quality quilt after only three months of effort, a single machine can provide every household in Ontario with a dozen identical quilts in the same period of time. And what about that good old art of conversation? Well, perhaps it hasn't occurred to you that every possible thing most people will ever say is probably being said at this very instant. And even today, the vast majority of that conversation is available to us via computer networks like the Internet! Why bother speaking when you can listen to someone else who was going to say the same thing anyway? So much for that.
Of course, humans have always had a "thing" for meaningless destruction. We're awfully good at polluting our air with our factories, killing our trees with our chainsaws, drowning our canaries with our overfilled birdbaths. This, of course, explains why we haven't already taken every example of technology, nuked it into tiny little pieces, and sent it to the moon in order to pollute that too. We like it when we get to lie around and vegetate all afternoon and watch the canaries die, and we would like it more if we could do it all day! "Let the machines outdo Grandma by a factor of 100 million," we think to ourselves. "She probably doesn't care anyway."”
- Avery Pennarun
Thoughts about productivity-inflation from 1995, uncannily pertinent today. Games, of course, are the exception - inefficiency is fundamental to a good game (prefer to play solitaire with a deck that's shuffled, or pre-arranged from A to K?). However, I wouldn't consider the existence of fun a good enough excuse to deny others the joys of usefulness. Rather, game design might offer some interesting ideas about the ethics of automation.
Going through my ballot, I see Prop 24 which appears to improve consumer privacy protections. Should be a clear win, right? Wrong! It turns out that this deceptive measure simply weakens the CCPA (which already provides the protections listed in Prop 24's description). Trust the EFF, ACLU, and League of Women Voters on this one, and please join me in voting no on Prop 24.
Software should make revenue by providing value that's worth paying for, not through a roundabout advertising economy built on dishonest spying.
