Suggestions
Michael van der Steen
Chief Executive Officer at Atlas Air
Michael van der Steen, a seasoned Business Analyst and Process Design expert, possesses a Bachelors degree in Business Administration from Nyenrode Business University. With extensive international exposure, including Nordics, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, and the United States, Michael has excelled in a diversified spectrum of industries ranging from insurance, financial institutions and banks.
Having held several leadership roles, he has effectively linked together corporate strategies, operations, and IT, steering organizations towards achieving business objectives, understanding challenges, and delivering value propositions that align with a company's wide business vision.
An adept Business Analyst, Michael has displayed crucial capabilities in business process redesign, customer due diligence, credit, and market risk while adhering to principal frameworks like BIS, scorecards, and decision-making, to offer unimpeachable value.
Apart from his extensive experience in the financial-security sphere, Michael's creativity and innovative skills stand out, for instance, founding and chairing the User Centered Design Competence Group at Atos. Additionally, he has served as a speaker, a coach, and a product owner, giving his expertise to various institutions, such as the IIBA NL, and D66's Electoral Program Committee.
Highlights
Some Tuesday morning thoughts:
Quality is expensive. But is it? Let’s look at VanMoof, the Dutch e-bike manufacture that went bankrupt today 📈
Up until a year ago, VanMoof was a shining star, delivering high quality e-bikes with a simple, appealing design. 🚲
Well, their first two models were of high quality (with a breakdown rate lower or equal to industry standard of 0.01 (meaning 1 in every 100 bikes broke down). Their recent model - the S3 - had a breakdown rate of 0.1 (1 in every 10). This means lower quality 🫤
Not used and prepared for this, VanMoof had difficulty to handle all the returned bikes and simultaneously produce or deliver new ordered bikes, lowering quality even more 😱
Now transport this to your software product. It is worthwhile investing a bit more time upfront to spend time on solving bugs, organizing meetings to allocate them to a team, have unsatisfied users and stakeholders in the mean time and quickly repair something without understanding why a bug was created initially (I.e. finding the true root cause).
Quality costs less, as long as you are willing and able to look beyond just the cost of coding and understanding the bigger impact of bugs and their less visible costs
What is the REAL root cause? 🤔
❌ It is not the cause that leads to a symptom ✅ It is your way of working that leads to the cause that leads to a symptom.
Think about it… 💭
You might solve something in your code that leads to a symptom (e.g. an error or unwanted user behavior) 🤩
… but if you do not investigate WHY you created that code in first place, you doom yourself to repeat it eventually 😕
So next time, dig deeper and don’t stop until you find the REAL root cause 👍
More background? I’ve got you 🤗 (worth investing 30 minutes of your time on a mind-set changing talk by Niels Malotaux )
https://lnkd.in/eyXE9Y7u
#zero #defects (yes, it CAN be done ✅)
