Sign In

Dr Michele Veldsman

Director of Neuroscience R&D and Founder

Dr. Michele Veldsman is the Founder and CEO of playroom, a platform designed to connect, support, and protect families online. The idea for playroom emerged from her personal experiences as a busy working mother, highlighting the challenges of organizing social interactions for her children. She recognized a gap in the market for a secure space where parents could easily connect and share resources, leading to the creation of playroom.13

Background and Education

Michele has an academic background in neuroscience and has held significant roles in research and development. She is currently the Director of Neuroscience R&D at Cambridge Cognition, where she applies her expertise to the tech industry.35 Her educational credentials include studies at the University of Cambridge.2

Vision for playroom

The core mission of playroom is to facilitate meaningful connections among families while easing the mental load associated with parenting. Michele aims to create a community where parents can share experiences, organize activities, and support one another in a safe online environment.1 The platform is still in its developmental phase, with plans to build partnerships within the early years and prenatal sectors.1

Future Aspirations

Michele is actively participating in accelerator programs to refine her business strategies and enhance her pitch for potential investors. She emphasizes the importance of networking and seeking feedback from peers in the entrepreneurial community as crucial steps for early-stage founders.14

In summary, Michele Veldsman's work with playroom reflects her commitment to enhancing family connections through technology, driven by her personal insights and professional expertise.

Highlights

Aug 28 · linkedin

I didn’t get the Innovate UK Women in Innovation grant

(25 funded out of 1452 applications - I’ll leave you to calculate the odds)

BUT, I did get amazing feedback…

By the way, I’m angel raising SEIS assured.

Some feedback that was wonderful to read:

💖This is a very compelling and strong proposal. Motivation, timeliness and level of innovation is very high and applicant is very well placed to carry out the project and be an excellent role model.

💪🏽The applicant has excellent academic and business development credentials combined with lived experience of the challenges being targeted. The proposed App, currently in MVP form, looks highly innovative and could have meaningful impact as well as strong commercial returns.

👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽The project itself is an exercise in research with key customer groups alongside MVP testing with users to provide solid validation of the need and prospects for the full launch of the App post-project. The approach to the project demonstrates sound judgement in forward planning terms.

💕The applicant has clear vision for the purpose and objectives for the project and is highly focused on delivery of this piece of work. It seems clear that funding would significantly effect positive impact on the project and the applicant's business.

🚀Highly competent description of the proposed workplan, tasks and goals with responsibilities, dependencies and logic clearly described. The risk analysis is comprehensive, competently analysed and the mitigations should be effective.

🙌🏽The applicant makes a compelling case for an alternative approach to creating quality connection between families that avoids the pathologies of large social media engines. Their analysis and preparatory work to date is impressive and their market research suggests an approach that is better configured to the needs and legitimate fears of parents.

Aug 26 · linkedin

Imagine two identical start ups, same idea, same execution, same product market fit...

Here are some differences that may not be immediately obvious - genuinely interested if these things are taken into consideration...

Start up Founder A, although not funded, comes from a higher socio-economic status (SES) band and has more available cash (perhaps eg living rent-free, no dependents)

Start up Founder B, also not funded, but from a lower SES band, and less available cash.

Here are the many ways in which Founder A can get an advantage, based solely on access to resources (let me know if I missed any)

🎓 Early on, school and academic prestige, sets up a network of friends and family that help throughout the journey

🤝 This network provides warm intros, advisory boards, mentors, connections, even high profile customers

Available cash can be spent on: 🌐 Professional or freelance web design 🎨 Pitch deck design 📱 Prototype development 📰 PR and comms 📈 Traction building 💵 Investor intros/platforms 💻 Software, AI tools, automation 🏆 Start up awards

Now none of these things necessarily make the startup successful, but how much do they separate Founder A and Founder B? And is there any way to account for it?

Related Questions

How did Michele transition from academia to entrepreneurship?
What inspired Michele to create playroom?
What challenges has Michele faced as a founder?
How does playroom ensure the safety of its users?
What partnerships is playroom currently developing?
Dr Michele Veldsman
Dr Michele Veldsman, photo 1
Dr Michele Veldsman, photo 2
Add to my network

Experience

Director of Neuroscience R&D at Cambridge Cognition (October 2022 - Present)
Founder and CEO at playroom (April 2021 - Present)

Education

PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience from University of Cambridge (2009 - 2013); BSc in Experimental Psychology from University of Bristol (2003 - 2006)

Location

Greater Oxford Area