Suggestions
Oliver Marsh
Founder @ The Data Skills Consultancy. For research/government/comms work see oliver-marsh.com
Oliver Marsh is a high-achieving professional with a Master of Science (MSci) degree in History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science from the prestigious University of Cambridge, where he excelled with first-class grades in both his Bachelor of Arts (BA) and Master of Science (MSc) degrees.
Oliver Marsh is the talented Founder of The Data Skills Consultancy, bringing a wealth of expertise and experience to the organization. Prior to this role, he served as a Consultant at a self-employed capacity, showcasing his entrepreneurial spirit and innovation.
Oliver Marsh has a proven track record of success in the public sector, having held significant roles in various government departments. His prior positions include Head of Data Adequacy, EU/EEA at the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS), Senior Data Analyst & Stakeholder Lead at the Rapid Response Unit at 10 Downing Street, Data Journalist at the Cabinet Office, and Researcher at the Centre for Analysis of Social Media at Demos.
In the academic realm, Oliver Marsh has contributed significantly, serving as a Seminar Leader and Teaching Assistant at University College London for the Science and Technology Studies as well as the Bachelor of Arts and Sciences programs. His academic journey also includes a role as a PhD Researcher at UCL in the Department of Science and Technology Studies.
Highlights
Summary of points we've made in recent media appearances for/by AlgorithmWatch on social media and racist riots in the UK, from a policy perspective.
To start, of course, my heart goes out to all those in the UK, particularly those feeling targeted for no reason other than racism, whipped up by many sources not just social media.
What can be done against online behaviour which contributes to these harms? Currently the UK can only play whack-a-mole with individual criminals, and just say stern words to platforms, rather than address decisions and practices by platforms which allows (even incentivises) harmful behaviour. That's where laws can help. With the risk assessments demanded by new laws like the Digital Services Act (and the upcoming Online Safety Act in the UK) regulators can actually ask platforms, with threats of enforcement - show us what you did to try and stop things like this? Why didn't it work? What are you changing in response? We've seen effects in the EU like TikTok not rolling out TikTok Lite over concerns around addictive design - laws can change decisions and business.
Data access and content moderation requirements in the laws could also push against recent worrying trends of platforms to make data access harder and content moderation teams smaller. (A reminder that we are less than a week from Meta closing their important data access tool Crowdtangle, and X is still charging $1000s per month for data access which used to be free).
However when we look to the EU, we find important questions about implementation of the Digital Services Act which (currently) limit these opportunities. These issues need to be learned from, and addressed, to protect against similar situations to what we have seen in the UK. Most importantly, the platforms' risk assessments are not shared outside platforms and regulators, limiting the amount of expert scrutiny - an issue the UK may also be repeating. Implementation of data access rules has been very patchy.
And ultimately laws aren't a replacement for good, collaborative behaviour, where external experts can help plug the platforms' blind spots and expertise gaps. We have seen examples, e.g. around deep fakes in the Slovakian elections, where platforms (in this case Meta) drew on external groups well. But that is not the norm. Platforms' business practices, "trade secrets", and interests in keeping things locked-down and internal cannot be prioritised above these important relationships. As we have seen in the last few days in the UK, there are risks of real, substantial harms.
You can also hear me on BBC Good Morning Scotland, 1h12 in, also trying to stop the conversation being dominated by Eln Msk news (and reminding everyone he's not actually a free speech warrior ): https://lnkd.in/eWaDP--D
In DE: Matthias Spielkamp was also on DLFKultur at 8:10 this morning (08.08) and there's a piece on our response in Tagesspiegel Background Digitalisierung & KI for subscribers.
📢 News! I have a new position at AlgorithmWatch: I am now their Head of Tech Research.
I'll still be working on the Digital Services Act, and our Auditing Algorithms for Systemic Risks project. But I'll be also thinking about work, partnerships, strategies etc. to build great research ↔️ great tech policy & advocacy overlaps.
I've been so interested in these questions since my PhD, so it's wonderful to have this role. As always, if these are things you are thinking about, get in touch!
Thanks as always to Matthias Spielkamp for the opportunity, and to great colleagues including Clara Helming , Michele Loi , Angela Müller and many more.
