Suggestions
Olivia Cotes-James
Founder & CEO LUÜNA裸月- Forbes 30U30
Olivia Cotes-James is the Founder and CEO of LUÜNA naturals, a B Corp-certified social enterprise focused on advancing gender equality through natural period and symptom care products.3 Born in New Zealand in 1991 to a Hong Kong-born mother and British father, she grew up in the UK.4
Cotes-James founded LUÜNA in June 2019, driven by her personal experiences with menstrual health issues and a desire to provide safer, more sustainable period products.34 The company offers organic tampons, liners, and pads, as well as educational programs to destigmatize menstruation.13
Key achievements and recognitions for Olivia Cotes-James include:
- Forbes 30 Under 30 honoree in 202135
- Cartier Women's Initiative Fellow in 20233
- Regional Debating Champion in 20093
- International Public Speaking Champion in July 20103
Under her leadership, LUÜNA has grown to reach over 300,000 employees and students across the Asia-Pacific region with their products and educational programs.2 The company operates in multiple countries, including Canada, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.1
Highlights
The ‘likeability double standard’ and the Golden Globes.
Two nights ago comedian Joe Koy hosted the Golden Globes. His performance as host has divided the internet. But we're not here to critique his comedic efforts.
One moment from the night has stood out in post-event commentary, leading to criticism of Taylor Swift. Her wrongdoing? Sipping her champagne and looking unamused in response to a joke, about her, that she clearly didn't find funny.
While many have defended her (Swifties and others alike), she is facing substantial backlash, with derogatory comments online labelling her 'a bitch' and worse, alongside even well-known public figures, like hosts of The View, criticizing her for not smiling (ok, I've never watched The View so maybe this take is true to their usual form - I don't know).
Simply the 'price of fame,' a price all actors must pay, some might argue. Yet when we look at other moments from the night, we see a clear double standard emerge that proves all actors are not subject to the same expectations.
For example, I haven't seen one criticism levelled at Ryan Gosling who, as one review of the night pointed out 'didn’t even attempt niceties, staring point-blankly at Koy' in response to the jokes about the Barbie Movie, in which Gosling acted.
Regardless of whether you think Swift and Gosling are well within their rights not to laugh (I’m in this corner, for what it’s worth), or you think they should have a been ‘good sports’ and at least smiled along, the issue here is the pervasive double standard.
This double standard has been extensively studied, especially in the workplace. Known as 'tightrope bias', it describes the narrow line women must walk between being assertive for respect and amiable for likability – a balance not demanded of men. Naz Beheshti explored this in 2019 Forbes piece (linked in comments) that is still relevant today:
"When asked to evaluate the hypothetical onboarding of a new manager, volunteers evaluated a high-powered woman as more unlikable than a man with identical qualities and background. Interestingly, those biases are held by both men and women...perceptions of women pit likability and competence against one another as if they were mutually exclusive."
She goes on to state that this "can create a challenging and unfair dynamic where women may face more scrutiny and backlash for their communication style than their male counterparts."
This bias is evident in the Golden Globes commentary. Swift is criticized for not displaying a warm, amiable response to jokes she didn't enjoy, while Gosling's similar reaction has been totally overlooked.
In moments like this, it's a good reminder to think about how we might personally react differently to men and women in similar situations, be it celebrities, managers, colleagues or acquaintances?
And on top of that, let's please stop telling women to smile. I promise you, it still happens.
This isn't just dull; it's dangerous.
Yet another instance of biased media reporting, where a company's hurdles are attributed to a woman.
Reese Witherspoon built a billion-dollar business and then sold it to one of the world's leading investors. Though the sale was in 2021, in a number of recent articles, headlines ascribe current business challenges to the woman behind its inception.
Why is this important to call out?
Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, female founders persistently face doubts about their ability to lead successful ventures. This sentiment manifests as biases throughout the business world, including - but not limited to - vastly unequal funding opportunities.
So why not a more accurate headline? "Two years post-acquisition, Blackstone strategies fail to advance the company Reese Witherspoon founded."
OR
"Amidst a challenging economic environment and media landscape, Blackstone plans for Reese Witherspoon-founded company meet roadblocks.'
Once such gender-biased media narratives are seen, they're hard to un-see.
I wrote about this last year, after The New York Times published an article that read, "The Sunsetting of the Girlboss Is Nearly Complete: Emily Weiss, the founder of Glossier, will no longer be the beauty company’s chief executive."
Due to caption limitations on LinkedIn, let's just sidestep the use of the term 'Girlboss' on this occasion.
Emily Weiss, who founded a multi-million-dollar beauty empire, helmed it as CEO for nearly a decade. Positioning a founder-CEO stepping down after this duration as a death knell for female leadership, rather than totally normal, is not just wildly inaccurate, but in this context, unveils the deeply-rooted gender biases in how female entrepreneurs are portrayed in the media.
There are very real world consequences of these biases, so let's absolutely call them out when we see them.
