Suggestions
Olivia Moore
Consumer partner at Andreessen Horowitz and co-founder of Accelerated
Olivia Moore is a Consumer Partner at Andreessen Horowitz, a prominent venture capital firm based in Silicon Valley. She joined the firm in June 2021, focusing on early-stage investments in consumer technology startups. Prior to her role at Andreessen Horowitz, Moore was an early-stage investor at CRV, where she specialized in technology for consumers and small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) from September 2017 to May 2021. She also worked at Goldman Sachs, where she was involved in alternative investments and manager selection.123
Moore holds a Bachelor of Arts with Honors and Distinction in Economics from Stanford University, where she graduated with a GPA of 4.10. During her time at Stanford, she was actively involved in student organizations and initiatives, including serving as Chief Investment Officer for the Associated Students of Stanford University and co-founding Cardinal Ventures, a startup incubator.34
In addition to her investment work, Olivia Moore co-founded "Accelerated," a community and newsletter aimed at young people interested in startups and venture capital, which has grown to include over 30,000 members. This initiative reflects her commitment to fostering the next generation of entrepreneurs and investors.234
Highlights
Under-discussed stat from Meta’s earnings call last week:
30% of product managers, designers, data scientists, and researchers are now shipping code
This is up from 5% a year ago 🤯
(Spoilers and potentially hot take ahead)
I have been thrown for a loop by the mainstream belief that (famous actress) is the “moral center” of You Can See Everything
Elizabeth and Billy are in no way victims, and perhaps this is a function of living / working in SF and seeing people fall victim to overconfidence and false belief despite all evidence…but their behavior was not surprising to me. And I don’t think the point of the movie was to relitigate her obvious guilt
Amanda, on the other hand, won an Emmy for playing Elizabeth in a hit TV show that she says many people believed was a documentary. She is possessive of her own “understanding” of Elizabeth, despite the fact that she was relieved not to meet / talk to her before the show so she had artistic freedom
Amanda also admits that several key lines in the show that viewers use to judge Elizabeth were inventions, but she’s defensive when Elizabeth is upset at her portrayal and says it didn’t happen that way
…and yet, she’s infuriated with Billy for “speaking for” Elizabeth on a public forum (X), when she arguably did the same to Elizabeth but on a much bigger scale and without permission. And, she continues to do so in the movie (via the re-enactments)
Am I missing something? Feels like a “no clear heroes here” situation
