Suggestions
Peter Huppertz
Retiring software engineer/certified SCRUM master, looking for a (part-time) way to remain active. Partial to coaching activities!
Peter Huppertz is a software developer currently working at Visma | yuki.12 He is based in Waarder, South Holland, Netherlands.2 Peter describes himself as a retiring software engineer and certified SCRUM master who is looking for ways to remain active, potentially in a part-time capacity.1 He has expressed a particular interest in coaching activities.1
Career Transition
Peter joined Visma | yuki in October 2021.3 He secured this position during the COVID-19 pandemic and expressed pride and excitement about the new opportunity.3 Prior to this role, Peter likely had extensive experience in software development, given his self-description as a "retiring software engineer".1
Skills and Expertise
As a software developer, Peter brings valuable technical skills to his role at Visma | yuki. Additionally, his certification as a SCRUM master suggests he has expertise in agile project management methodologies.1 This combination of technical and management skills likely makes him a versatile asset to his team.
Future Aspirations
While Peter is currently employed as a software developer, he has indicated an interest in transitioning towards retirement. However, he is not looking to completely step away from the industry. Instead, he is exploring part-time opportunities that would allow him to remain active in the field.1 His inclination towards coaching activities suggests he may be interested in mentoring or guiding less experienced professionals in the software development industry.1
Highlights
My retirement approaches with confident strides.
I have of course given thought about how to fill that in. It's likely going to look likt this:
- To prevent myself from vandalism, or from turning into a hermit behind a computer screen, accompanied by three cats and a spouse who (expertly) applies oil to canvas, I'm looking for a part-time activity that's not intellectually exhausting. Think "driving kids to and from school".
- This should enable me to have time and energy left for my own private projects, for which I didn't have the energy while working a fulltime job (yes, I'm talking to you, DocVault!).
- On top of that, I'd like to share some accumulated knowledge, so I'm going to make Youtube videos. The first series will be about polymorphism in .NET software development. How so? Well, for a large part because some time ago, I spoke to a few people who had successfully completed their HBO computer science education, and yet didn't grasp the concept of polymorphism as mush as I would have expected. And that while this isn't rocket science...
The first instalment has just gone online: https://lnkd.in/gk2PQEtf It aims at being understandable. Oh, and not too dry, so I'll be somewhat silly now and then. Take a look if you're interested. If you like it... [shameless plug] then please "like" it (you know, the thumbs-up thingy)! And if you're curious about what's to come (soon), it would be lovely if you'd hit the Subscribe button, because people in the know tell me that's good for my exposure. :)
"What do you want to talk about?"
I want to talk about generative artificial intelligence, and about that it isn't even close to "intelligence", artificial or not.
In order to create intelligence, you'd have to start off with a strong foundation in clinical psychology as well as philosophy and morals. Generative AI may appear to know how, but it has no concept of why. It doesn't want; it has no desire. It doesn't want to learn, it doesn't have a need of making new discoveries. Generative AI can only regurgitate what it has been trained on. It does not ask fundamental questions, it doesn't think about what it just said, it doesn't look at the picture it just created, it doesn't listen to the music it just regurgitated, let alone enjoy it.
If you're lucky, it will warn you for a possible nullreference exception when you test the length of a string, but only if it read somewhere else that this is generally a good idea.
And it only does what you ask it to do. If you don't ask it anything, it'll just sit there and be quiet.
It has all the properties of a tool. That's exactly what it is. Granted, it can be a very powerful tool, that can save you a lot of time, but you should still treat it as a junior craftsman, because it will make stupid mistakes... because it never asks itself why, it never second-questions itself.
There is also nothing to fear in todays AI itself. What we should fear, and guard ourselves against, is the motivation of the human who uses the tool.
History has proven that we can do that. In World War II, the Dutch inundated parts of the country, in order to give infantry and cavalry a hard time.
So the Germans sent some planes in. So far for the Hollandse Waterlinie. But we learnt how to deal with that. Plus we learnt to fly planes ourselves, and we even did good things with them.
Give humanity some time and it'll figure out how to deal with this.
When real artificial intelligence emerges, complete with desires and motivation, and it doesn't comply with Isaac Asimov's Laws of Robotics... THAT's when we'll be in real trouble.
But today is not that day.
