Suggestions
Rajeev Thankappan
I am ...
Rajeev Thankappan is a versatile entrepreneur skilled in product management, marketing, and business development. He has contributed his prowess to several Start-ups and Fortune 500 companies, including NetApp, Cisco Systems, Hewlett Packard, Sun Microsystems, Tandem, Compaq, Fujitsu, among others. He is also experienced in team leadership, professional consulting, and new project introduction. Rajeev's interests and expertise lie in the areas of Solar, Security, AI, IoT, Blockchain, Big Data, Open Computing, Autonomous Vehicles, Electric, and Hybrid Vehicles, among other domains. He has a strong educational background and has studied Mechanical Engineering, Computer Science, and Product Management at prestigious institutions such as the University of California, Stanford University, and California State University-Chico.
Highlights
California’s governor has the chance to make AI history. Gavin Newsom could decide the future of AI safety. But will he cave to billionaire pressure?
Advocates say it is a modest law setting “clear, predictable, common-sense safety standards” for artificial intelligence. Opponents say it is a dangerous and arrogant step that will “stifle innovation.”
In any event, SB 1047 — California state Sen. Scott Wiener’s proposal to regulate advanced AI models offered by companies doing business in the state — has now passed the California State Assembly by a margin of 48 to 16. Back in May, it passed the Senate by 32 to 1. Once the Senate agrees to the assembly’s changes to the bill, which it is expected to do shortly, the measure goes to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk.
The bill, which would hold AI companies liable for catastrophic harms their “frontier” models may cause, is backed by a wide array of AI safety groups, as well as luminaries in the field like Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio, and Stuart Russell, who have warned of the technology’s potential to pose massive, even existential dangers to humankind. It got a surprise last-minute endorsement from Elon Musk, who among his other ventures runs the AI firm xAI.
Lined up against SB 1047 is nearly all of the tech industry, including OpenAI, Facebook, the powerful investors Y Combinator and Andreessen Horowitz, and some academic researchers who fear it threatens open source AI models. Anthropic, another AI heavyweight, lobbied to water down the bill. After many of its proposed amendments were adopted in August, the company said the bill’s “benefits likely outweigh its costs.”
What’s inside SB 1047?
To have attracted all of this intense lobbying, one might think that SB 1047 is an aggressive, heavy-handed bill — but, especially after several rounds of revisions in the State Assembly, the actual law does fairly little.
It would offer whistleblower protections to tech workers, along with a process for people who have confidential information about risky behavior at an AI lab to take their complaint to the state Attorney General without fear of prosecution. It also requires AI companies that spend more than $100 million to train an AI model to develop safety plans. (The extraordinarily high ceiling for this requirement to kick in is meant to protect California’s startup industry, which objected that the compliance burden would be too high for small companies.)
The Solar-Car Competition That Has EV Recruiters Buzzing. The American Solar Challenge has emerged as a prime source for talent in the auto industry
