Suggestions
Rich Bradbury
Rancher focusing on Grass-Fed Beef - Regenerative Agriculture - Ranch & Rural Real Estate
Rich Bradbury is a Rural Real Estate Broker at High Country Real Estate, with extensive experience in the ranching industry spanning over 30 years. He is committed to regenerative ranching practices, emphasizing sustainability and responsible land management.
In addition to his real estate career, Bradbury has been involved with the Adel Water Improvement District (AWID), where he contributes his expertise in water resource management. His background reflects a strong dedication to both the agricultural community and sustainable practices in rural real estate.
For more detailed insights into his professional journey, you can view his LinkedIn profile here.
Highlights
Urban guilt about the environment, in my view, poses the most significant threat to the environment, and it is starting to seem clear that radical environmental ideologies fade beyond urban boundaries. They can not hold up to the practical knowledge that accompanies proximity.
I've been revisiting Jesuit Casuistry, a concept I first encountered in a 2019 podcast by Malcolm Gladwell. Originating from St. Ignatius Loyola about 500 years ago, Jesuit Casuistry analyzes individual cases for moral decision-making, moving away from traditional rule-based ethics. It gained prominence among Jesuits in the 16th and 17th centuries, advocating for a deep understanding of specific situations before applying moral principles. In the 20th century, it saw a resurgence in fields like professional ethics, law, bioethics, and business ethics. It offered nuanced solutions to complex ethical dilemmas by balancing moral principles with case intricacies.
This concept resurfaced in my mind during my discussions with Margaret Maizel about the Thacker Pass Lithium Mine. I respect Margaret, but I struggled with her and David Seal's apparent indifference to sacrificing one ecosystem for a broader environmental goal. This led me to question our framework for discussing local impacts on the overall environment.
The disconnect, as I see it, lies in society's limited understanding of the macro-environment, which by sheer size and complexity is abstract and overshadows the practicality of local "grounded genius," or knowledge of one's immediate ecosystem. It is impossible for one overarching environmental perspective to address the needs and nuances of the many ecosystems that comprise the whole. We should probably stop carrying on like they do.
It would be asinine to tell a magnolia herder that because I used X solution on the Great Basin Sagebrush Steppe, he should apply that same solution to grazing yaks on the Eastern Mongolian Steppes and that by doing that, we can stop deforestation in Brazil.
This is evident in debates like Allan Savory vs. George Monbiot, where one focuses on local ecology and the other on the infinitely complex global environment, creating a negative feedback loop of conflict that only feeds on itself, ultimately unsupportable and counterproductive.
So, we can't offset the negative environmental impact of Los Angeles by planting trees in Manitoba. We can only fix the negative environment of Los Angeles in Los Angeles.
Considering this, I'm thinking of exploring Conservation based Casuistry. What are your thoughts?
We don't have a Lithium mine in Nevada to offset CO2 spewing out of Manhattan. Manhattan needs to stop burdening faraway ecosystems with their apathy.
Also, here is a pic of a fat guy on a horse
Yesterday, The Girl and I attended the Innovation Hub meeting in Klamath Falls.
We sat in a symmetric glass-faced building, each angle crisp and precise.
Protected by bureaucracy, we looked out into a world of asymmetry.–Lakes, timber, meadows, wildlife, an array of people, trailer parks, a truck stop, daily commence. From where we sat, we were supposed to place order into the disorder beyond the glass.
It was an exercise in emptiness. The order is outside the glass, always has been, and will be beautifully irrational and brutally functional. This scares us, and we've stopped trying to understand its complexities. We naively hold to the notion that we can have a disproportionate influence in systems that functions in complete independence of our machinations. But we try nonetheless.
Nature thrives on diversity, adaptability, resilience. It's about the asymmetric approach, where species leverage unique strengths. Just like in the private marketplace, where flexibility, innovation, and risk-taking drive growth. It's the energy in these asymmetric strategies that fuels adaptation and create fertile ground for change.
Contrast that with symmetric strategies, like imposing order in the wilds. In ecology, think of monoculture farming or overly managed landscapes. They're fragile, lacking diversity to withstand shocks. The same goes for bureaucratic economic strategies, where standardization stifles innovation. It's like trying to tame a bobcat. It just don't work.
Bobcats react to nature's signals. Their survivability relies on improvisation and flowing seamlessly with their surroundings. Obesreve and react.
When we embrace the complexity and energy of asymmetric strategies, we thrive. Our economies prosper, just like a resilient ecosystem. But get caught up in the rigidity of symmetric governmental approaches, and we'll find ourselves stuck.
Funked
So here it is–this tango between ecology and economics, between asymmetry and symmetry, shaping our world. Whether we're talking about nature's whims or the bustling markets, the parallels are undeniable.
Successful strategy is not found behind perfect-hewn glass.
Navajo weavers would purposely incorporate a flaw into their rugs, a practice known as the "Weaver's Pathway," to acknowledge that perfection is unattainable and to honor the natural imperfections and asymmetry of life.
There's restrictive energy in symmetry. The pursuit of order becomes rigid. Let's embrace the progressive and freeing energy of asymmetry, where we read and react to the signals as they are. It's in the disorder and flow that we find balance, innovation, resilience, and prosperity. The willingness to embrace the complexities of nature–tap into the grounded genius that comes from truly understanding our space, our place?
Symmetry represents restrictive, unbalanced control. Our path should always be the wild, untamed energy of asymmetry, where the real order and wisdom lie.
