Suggestions
Salvador E. Pérez
Associate at Strumwasser & Woocher LLP
Salvador E. Pérez is a highly educated individual with a strong academic background. He holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.) from Stanford Law School, a Master of Public Administration (M.P.A.) from Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and a Bachelor of Arts from Stanford University.
Throughout his career, Salvador has been associated with various prestigious organizations. He is currently an Associate at Strumwasser Woocher. Previously, he served as a Law Clerk to the Honorable Mary H. Murguia at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He also worked as an Associate at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, and as a Law Clerk to the Honorable Diana Saldaña at the U.S. District Courts.
Salvador E. Pérez has garnered valuable experience through his diverse professional history. He has held positions such as a Summer Associate at O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Law Clerk at the Office of the White House Counsel at the Executive Office of the President, Research Assistant at Human Rights Watch, Special Assistant to the Democratic Caucus Chairman at the U.S. House of Representatives, Project Assistant at the National Democratic Institute, and CHCI Public Policy Fellow in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs at the U.S. Department of State. Additionally, he has interned at the District Office of Congressman Xavier Becerra at the U.S. House of Representatives.
With his extensive academic qualifications and varied experience in prestigious organizations, Salvador E. Pérez brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise in law, public administration, and policy making to his current role at Strumwasser Woocher.
Highlights
Major California Court of Appeal decision out of the First Appellate District this week upholding the lawfulness of non-citizen voting in school board elections. This is a BIG win for immigrant rights, parents, and school accountability.
ABSOLUTELY ECSTATIC to share we've secured a major legal victory for criminal justice reform in California. The Court of Appeal has issued a unanimous published opinion REVERSING a 2021 trial court judgment declaring Measure J unconstitutional. That measure, an L.A. County Charter amendment, was adopted by an overwhelming majority of the County's voters in 2020. It requires the Board of Supervisors to annually allocate at least 10 percent of locally-generated unrestricted revenues in the general fund (estimated to be between $360 million and $900 million) to direct community investments (such as youth programs, job training, rental assistance, and affordable housing) and alternatives to incarceration. Measure J, I'm delighted to say, is constitutional and now legally enforceable.
This was an incredibly hard-fought win. We were up against a well-respected trial judge, naysayers, and a seemingly skeptical appellate panel. Major thanks to my colleagues for entrusting me with principal authorship of the briefs and with oral argument.
For those interested in the substance, the appeal raised interesting and important issues of constitutional law, including the authority of charter counties, preemption, and the right of initiative.
