Sign In

Shuman Ghosemajumder

Global Head of AI at F5 • Chairman at TeachAids

Shuman Ghosemajumder is a tech leader known for his expertise in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and product development.

He holds an MBA from the MIT Sloan School of Management at the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Additionally, he completed a BSc in Computer Science at Western University in Canada.

With an impressive professional background, Shuman has served as the Global Head of Artificial Intelligence at F5, demonstrating his in-depth knowledge and strategic vision in the AI domain. Prior to his role at F5, he co-founded TeachAids and served as its Chairman, showcasing his entrepreneurial spirit and dedication to educational technology.

He also held the position of Chief Technology Officer at Shape Security, a role that saw him navigate the complex world of cybersecurity to protect organizations from digital threats. Notably, Shape Security was later acquired by F5, further solidifying Shuman's influence in the tech industry.

Before his time at F5, Shuman Ghosemajumder made significant contributions to Google, where he held the role of Global Head of Product, Trust & Safety. This experience equipped him with valuable insights into product development and ensuring user safety in the online space.

Shuman Ghosemajumder's diverse background and extensive experience in AI, cybersecurity, and product management make him a respected figure in the tech sector, contributing to innovation and digital security on a global scale.

Highlights

Aug 10 · linkedin

I was shocked and incredibly saddened to hear of Susan Wojcicki's passing this morning.

Susan had a tremendous influence on the world we live in today. She also had a huge impact on me and my career.

I was very fortunate to be hired into Google by Susan and to have her as my manager. Before my interview with her, I was told by another Googler to not dress so formally (as one would do on the east coast at the time). Susan wasn't about show, she was about substance.

Just as Larry and Sergey were known mononymously at Google (no last name required, like Madonna or Prince), "Susan" was larger than life. She was the reasoned voice that absolutely everyone in an executive meeting would quiet down to listen to.

An insightful piece of advice that I got from her, that I have repeated to my teams over the years, was that "being a good product manager is about everyone always being a little mad at you". The lesson was about balance between stakeholders and the mental strength needed to carry through good decisions. In a company that was so engineering-heavy, Susan herself was not an engineer. But that made her the perfect person to show us how product management at Google needed to work, especially for advertising and partnership products like AdSense.

Over the years I worked with Susan, not only did she create amazing opportunities for me and teach me so much, but she assembled the most concentrated group of talent I had ever met. Wesley Chan, Gokul Rajaram, Satya Patel, and Hunter Walk are all known as phenomenally successful VC investors and mentors today, but we all sat in the same room back then as PMs led by Susan. It was also through her that I worked with Eva Ho (also known now for her success as a VC) and Jon Steinback (now head of Creative and Marketing at Deepmind). All of us working together 20 years later on Reken is just one of many testaments to Susan's enduring impact.

And all of this is describing the time before YouTube, for which Susan is best known today, and is perhaps the most influential technology in the modern world. When our niece and nephew were little, they didn’t know the names of most Hollywood celebrities, but they knew “Susan” (again, mononymously) from YouTube.

Susan, thank you for everything. We will miss you greatly.

Jul 12 · linkedin

You may have seen the news about the massive AT&T data breach this morning. Here's a simple summary and some recommendations.

What happened:

  1. What was stolen: nearly all customers' call and text records — but not the contents of calls or texts. That means that the breach exposed phone numbers you communicated with, and the number of times you communicated with them, but not what you said, wrote, or even what time the conversations occurred.

  2. Phone numbers of parties you communicated were exposed, but their names were not. Of course, phone numbers can easily be used to identify names, and this also means that even if you aren't an AT&T customer, your phone number was likely exposed.

  3. The breach affected customer data from May through October 2022, as well as on January 2, 2023.

My recommendations:

  1. Use encrypted communication services like iMessage, FaceTime, WhatsApp, and Signal whenever you can, rather than basic voice and text. This particular breach may not have exposed the contents of calls and texts, but the next one might. End-to-end encrypted services protect against this (with some caveats).

  2. Use authenticator apps or passkeys instead of SMS-based two-factor authentication, if possible. One of the biggest points of indirect vulnerability is that peoples' phone numbers are available in many breached datasets. This tells cybercriminals exactly what numbers to attack to bypass two-factor authentication.

  3. Minimize your data exposure footprint by sharing less personal data with fewer services, including limiting permissions you grant to random apps. Data breaches will continue to happen. The best defense is having less of your data out there to be stolen.

Finally, people will remember this as a 2024 breach, but the breach itself happened in 2022 and was only identified this April. This is common, and we don't know how many data breaches have already occurred which simply haven't been discovered yet. Our best long-term solution is data minimization and easier-to-adopt strong security practices by both companies and users.

Shuman Ghosemajumder
Add to my network

Location

San Francisco Bay Area