Suggestions
Will Richardson
Co-Founder, Author, Educator, and Speaker
Will Richardson is an influential educator, author, and speaker, known for his work in educational technology and reform. He is the co-founder of the Big Questions Institute (BQI), where he focuses on helping educators navigate the complexities of modern education through innovative frameworks and tools. His recent publication, "One Foot in the Future: New frameworks, tools, and lenses to help educators imagine...", emphasizes the need for schools to adapt to rapidly changing societal and technological landscapes .13
Background and Contributions
Richardson has a rich history in education, having spent 22 years as a public school teacher. He gained recognition for his pioneering use of blogs in the classroom, which earned him accolades as a "trendsetter in education" by The New York Times in 2003 .2 He has authored several notable works, including Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms, and has been involved in various educational initiatives aimed at integrating technology into learning environments .23
Focus Areas
In his work with BQI, Richardson addresses critical issues facing education today, such as:
- Regenerative Design: Advocating for educational practices that consider environmental sustainability.
- Design Fiction: Encouraging educators to envision future scenarios to better prepare students for upcoming challenges.
- Schoolpunk Movement: Promoting a collaborative approach among educators to rethink schooling .34
Richardson's insights are particularly relevant as schools grapple with the implications of generative AI technologies and the ongoing challenges posed by climate change and social equity .34 His approach encourages educators to adopt a proactive stance in shaping educational futures rather than merely reacting to changes as they occur.
Personal Life
Richardson resides in Flemington, New Jersey, with his family. He maintains an active online presence through various platforms, including LinkedIn and Twitter, where he shares his thoughts on education and technology .12
For more detailed insights into his work and philosophy, you can explore his free ebook available through the Big Questions Institute.
Highlights
I've been re-reading Vanessa Andreotti's amazing book "Hospicing Modernity" (for the third time) and one question that has popped up this time is around the idea of "problem-based learning."
She writes:
"It may be useful to evoke a distinction between 'problems' (things that can actually or potentially be fixed) and 'predicaments' (things that must constantly be dealt with, won't be solved, and won't go away). There is also a difference between something 'complicated' that can be sorted with careful planning or engineering (e.g., a long car trip with toddlers) and something 'complex' that is moving, multidimensional, and largely unruly, unmanageable, and unpredictable (e.g., raising children)." 30
Are current "progressive" approaches to education that center solving "problems" preparing children for the "predicaments" that will be a feature in their lives? We do understand that our emerging challenges are both complex AND long-lasting, not to be solved as much as lived through, right?
While I do hate the unending list of adjectives that we put in front of the noun (why are we uncomfortable with just calling it "learning"?) I might suggest that in a framing sense, "predicament-based learning" is an interesting shift to consider for a system where traditional outcomes and pedagogies are quickly becoming irrelevant for the world. How do we help kids build the skills and dispositions for living with "predicaments"?
As always, this assumes that we've done the work to understand why traditional outcomes and pedagogies are quickly becoming irrelevant and how current approaches are contributing to our challenges, not ameliorating them. How's that work going?
#education #edleadership #schooling
Move along...nothing to see here. It'll all be ok.
Actually, maybe not.
If you're making decisions in schools and not using this future scenario...based on the best science available at this moment...as a lens to think about what to do next, you are simply not serving the children in front of you.
This is the hand we have dealt ourselves. The purpose of education is changing dramatically.
You getting this?
