Suggestions
William Haas Evans
Principal Consultant, Head of Product Strategy & Design Practice | Jonah® | Corporate & Product Strategy | Value-Driven Transformations | M&A (Design Thinking Post-Merger Integration)
William Haas Evans is a seasoned professional with a rich background in experience design, healthcare, and consumer web industries, where he emphasizes the significance of design thinking and service design to enhance customer satisfaction and drive profitability.
Through his deep expertise in building future-oriented organizational transformation teams, Will has successfully led transformative projects for Fortune 50 companies, startups, and nonprofits across various sectors.
His role as a principal and executive creative director involved establishing teams, expanding client portfolios, and developing innovative products, leading to patents for his work in online search and navigation systems.
As an advocate for innovation and cultural change, Will specializes in advising clients on creating products, services, and ecosystems that boost financial performance, while nurturing cultures of continuous discovery and delivery.
William's passion for grooming the next generation of design thinkers is evident through his teaching engagements at NYU’s Stern School of Business and his collaboration with renowned figures like Simon Sinek.
His academic journey includes studies in High Performance Leadership Program at The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, M.S. Brain and Cognitive Sciences, M.S. Human Computer Interaction at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and A.B. in Mathematics and Philosophy from Occidental College.
Throughout his career, Will has held key positions such as Chief Design Officer, Managing Director, Founder, and Design Thinker in Residence at various organizations, where he has left a mark in product strategy, enterprise digital transformation, and experience design practices.
Currently residing in Boca Raton with his family, William continues to inspire and lead in the realms of design, innovation, and enterprise agility.
His latest accomplishment includes authoring 'Designing Resilience: The Strategy, Structure, and Spirit of Enterprise Agility.'
Highlights
Cicero Challenge | Day 89 of 90, “The Substrate-Independence Theory: Advancing Constructor Theory to Scaffold Substrate Attributes for the Recursive Interaction between Knowledge and Information,” by John Turner 🇺🇸 🇺🇦, Dave Snowden, and Nigel Thurlow 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇬🇧, Systems, 2022; which Charles Plath & I included, choosing to defer this article until the end of the challenge, hoping it would spur further conversation once we had done some network weaving (that was the assumption at least).
Article Link: https://lnkd.in/eBDiwV5Q
The article should be of interest (to Futures Thinking, Strategic Foresight and Transition Design, Design Futures folks), but the article (and framework) are a bit like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, ontologically speaking. You may not think you’re dealing with a foresight/strategy framework because it may not look like one. But, that’s exactly what it is, and the underlying techniques may lay waste to the gardens of competing frameworks, to borrow Kahlil Gibran’s phrase. Anyway, finally some time this weekend to read, re-read, and read again.
For more context and background: https://lnkd.in/eGqHnxRu
/whe #ComplexityScience #StrategicForesight #FuturesThinking #TransitionDesign
Cicero Challenge, we are now at Day 87 of 90, “Emplotting Durational Stories of Transformation: braiding narrative trajectories and multicasting in Transition Design,” By Adam Cowart, Journal of Future Studies, 2023, where Charles Plath and I tack back into the wind for a tactical examination of potentially valuable multidimensional storytelling that goes beyond classical hero's journey tropes.
Link: https://lnkd.in/ea4mWDh9
From the abstract: "The purpose of this paper is to address challenges in crafting prospective long-term stories in the Transition Design (TD) approach, and the importance of this skill set in Design Futures education in general, in order to weave long-term stories about the future in a manner that is both aspirational and compelling to inform on decision making and actions in the present. The paper contends that the challenge in this context is often not the content but the form of the story and how it is emplotted. The paper proposes the introduction of two storytelling methods to support durational and imaginative endeavors to articulate longer-term pathways: four-dimensional story arcs that add rising and falling “action” across multiple transition pathways to the future that are interdependent on each other to realize the preferred future successfully; and multi-temporal trajectories in which the traditional method of backcasting is complemented by nearcasting and middlecasting. The paper concludes with a durational storytelling prompt worksheet example to demonstrate how this approach to durational and aspirational futures storytelling can be practically applied in an academic or real-world context."
I'll start adding my reflections in the comments, but I thought this might be a good article to read as pregaming with Jaeger shots before we dive into "The Substrate-Independence Theory: Advancing Constructor Theory to Scaffold Substrate Attributes for the Recursive Interaction between Knowledge and Information," and "Change & Complexity: Vector Theory of Change."
#CiceroChallenge #StrategicForesight #TransitionDesign #FuturesThinking
