Suggestions
Anne Bertucio
Product Marketing Manager, Security, Google Cloud Platform at Google
Anne Bertucio is a Senior Program Manager in the Open Source Programs Office (OSPO) at Google.1 She leads initiatives related to open source security and privacy, focusing on improving the contributor experience and promoting transparency in projects.1
Professional Background
Anne's work at Google involves:
- Helping teams develop, contribute to, and release open source software5
- Leading efforts in open source security and privacy1
- Enhancing the contributor experience in open source projects1
- Promoting transparency in open source initiatives1
Additional Roles and Interests
Beyond her primary role at Google, Anne:
- Serves on the board of OpenUsage.org and the Cloud Native Computing Foundation2
- Participates in speaking engagements, such as OpenSSF Day at Open Source Summit North America3
- Is registered as a speaker for OpenStack events4
Personal Interests
Anne's social media presence indicates that she has a passion for:
- Open source technologies
- Security
- Dogs
- Cycling2
Her professional opinions shared on social media are her own, and she uses she/her pronouns.2
Highlights
For the last five years, Google's Open Source Programs Office has published a report of the company's work and contributions to open source. Out today is the 2023 report.
Last year, "roughly 10% of Alphabet's full-time workforce actively contributed to open source projects. This percentage has remained roughly consistent over the last five years."
This is a stat I'm really proud of. This isn't just engineering, this is 10% of everyone. It's a number that wouldn't happen without the incredible work of my OSS colleagues and the Googlers who use open source to do their jobs more effectively, to be creative and explore, and to support our technology commons.
https://lnkd.in/ge3zwC_y
Today Google released a new family of openly available models. They’re free to use for individual developers, researchers, and commercial use. Users can also create and publish model variants. We want to be clear that this model is not “open source,” as open source has a specific definition and licenses, and that definition is incredibly important. The permissions of that definition are how the industry has gotten to where we are now.
When it comes to AI, there’s a lot of to-be-answered questions about open source. How do we apply OSS concepts like derived works and author attribution to AI? How do we think about distribution with something that’s intentionally dynamic?
There’s also lots of concerns from users, researchers, and policymakers about AI safety. I think we’re really just at the start of figuring out open AI safety. Open source software security has already been on this journey. Rather than thinking about it as “open vs closed,” we need to recognize that different systems have different threat models, and they require different mitigations. I’d like to see us model, research, and design safety and security solutions specifically for open source AI. That’s how we’re going to have open and productive AI in our futures.
