Suggestions
Daniel Gluck
Founder and Executive Director of The Museum of Sex
Daniel Gluck is the founder and executive director of the Museum of Sex in New York City.1 Here are some key details about him:
-
He founded the Museum of Sex in 2002 and has been serving as its executive director since then.1
-
Gluck has a combined degree in Fine Arts from the Wharton School and the Graduate School of Fine Arts at the University of Pennsylvania, which he obtained in the early 1990s.2
-
Before founding the Museum of Sex, Gluck had started a few software companies in the 1990s.2
-
His vision for the Museum of Sex was to create a world-class institution that would examine sex from an anthropological and cultural perspective, rather than just being an erotic art museum.3
-
Gluck structured the Museum of Sex as a for-profit Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), partly due to challenges in obtaining nonprofit status for a museum with "sex" in its name.4
-
He has lived in various parts of New York, including Queens, Long Island, Westchester, Manhattan and Brooklyn. As of 2015, he was living in Tribeca with his wife and three children.3
-
Gluck's goal with the Museum of Sex is to advocate for open discourse about sex and sexuality, and to present current scholarship on these topics to a wide audience.4
Daniel Gluck has been instrumental in establishing and growing the Museum of Sex as a unique cultural institution in New York City over the past two decades.
Highlights
The global infant formula market is projected to grow to ~$100B by 2030.
Since 1980, two brands – Enfamil and Similac – have held 80% market share in the US.
When a Cronobacter sakazakii outbreak resulting in several illnesses and two infant deaths was linked to powdered formula in 2022, that began to shift.
Supply chain gaps from the pandemic, broken infrastructure, and lack of breastfeeding support led American consumers to view European formula brands as superior.
As a result, parents started zooming in on nutritional profiles in American baby formula.
Corn syrup, fillers, and palm oil are prominently listed on America’s dominant formula labels – ingredients you wouldn’t find in their European counterparts.
For example:
• The EFSA sets stringent guidelines for nutrient levels, the inclusion of DHA (an essential omega-3 fatty acid), and strict limits on contaminants such as pesticide residues. • European formulas mimic the nutritional profile of breast milk with lactose as the carbohydrate source, avoiding other sweeteners common in American formulas. • European formulas are largely organic and non-GMO, not yet standard in the US.
The challenge?
Despite proven benefits, regulatory red tape from the FDA prevents many European brands from entering the US.
One way forward?
Meet the demands of both European and American nutritional standards.
Today, Bobbie is the only company bridging this gap.
Coining the term “European-style” formula, Bobbie meets FDA’s regulatory standards while checking the EFSA boxes:
• Lactose as the carbohydrate source • Organic and non-GMO • Meets EU standards for DHA
The demand for cleaner baby formula ingredients is clear.
Of course, there are subjective preferences, accessibility limitations, and cost considerations that ultimately determine what parents buy.
But the trend toward “European style,” better-for-you formula is here to stay.
A reminder for leaders (and myself):
We can’t get complacent with remote communication.
Countless tools, apps, and notifications can give us a false sense of accessibility – and accountability – when navigating challenges within our organizations.
A recent example of this hit me hard:
I emailed a request to an executive leader at one of our portfolio companies.
I could tell from the executive's initial email response that we weren’t on the same page: why we were asking or what the outcome would be. It was a clear misunderstanding.
Instinctively, I picked up the phone and spoke to the executive. We hashed things out, but I could sense we were still not 100% aligned or convinced of the other's position.
A follow-up call seemed like the next step to get closure.
But rather than a phone call, I got in the car and drove to their office.
We spent an hour and a half actively listening to each other without distractions.
As we wrapped up our talk, I felt lighter. Better yet? Our relationship felt stronger.
It may seem like a “small” thing, but checking in with each other in person is transformative – something I have to remind myself to do in a world increasingly moving away from this. So much can get lost in translation over email – or even a video call.
Showing up shows you care. And I really do care about this person.
If we had not sat down, looked each other in the eyes, and shared our feelings, this could have culminated in a much larger (and unnecessary) issue.
The lesson:
An hour-long, in-person conversation can prevent months – even years – of disconnection.
It’s always worth your time to meet with your people in person.
