Suggestions
Eric Siegfried
Founder, tango.io
Eric Siegfried is the Cofounder and CEO of Tango, a nearshore app development company based in Portland, Oregon.1 He founded Tango in June 2010 to help bring great digital products to consumers and businesses.1 With a background in systems engineering and embedded test programming from his time at The Boeing Company, Eric leads Tango with a focus on providing modern Web and mobile backend development services.1
Eric's professional experience includes:
- Cofounder and CEO at Tango (June 2010 - Present)1
- Founder of Dancehop.com (October 2009 - June 2010)1
- Systems and Embedded Engineer at The Boeing Company (June 2005 - October 2009)1
He holds a Master's degree and a Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering from Washington University in St. Louis. Eric's areas of expertise include UX design, project management, and business development.1
Eric is passionate about helping others express themselves through technology and has a long history of nearshoring, startup advisory, and investing.1 He aims to create meaningful impact through his work at Tango, which provides distributed talent that integrates seamlessly with their clients' teams.1
Highlights
Don't hire a developer. Don't hire a JS dev. Don't hire a Python ML engineer. Don't hire a backend dev.
DON'T build a feature team. Build an empowered product team that solves real problems.
Work with people who collaborate well, understand the vision, understand the tools, and understand how customers get value.
Thanks to Jeremy Stryer for the inspiration for this post format. It's was an honor to have him on the team, and I'm excited to see him make an impact in his new venture.
I wrote this last night, prior to Sam Altman rejoining as CEO, and I feel like it's reinforcing my ideas: My take on this OpenAI debacle is that the nonprofit corporate structure created weird incentives instead of straightforward commercial skin in the game. The board hasn't backed up their drastic power play because there's no "there" there. Sam was probably following what he felt was the spirit of the agreement, while doing side bets to see some personal upside, which the board thought was unsafe. With so much invested, OpenAI would have been better off spinning out a foundation, and compensating Sam in a way he earned, instead of trying to both be a social good and massively commercial simultaneously.
