Sign In

James Gilland

Senior Scientist at Ohio Aerospace Institute

James Gilland is an accomplished researcher and manager with a strong background in advanced propulsion research, systems analysis, and mission analysis.

His research expertise covers a wide range of propulsion technologies, including magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) and radiofrequency (rf) plasma wave sources and thrusters, with a power capacity spanning from 300 W to 300 MW.

Currently, James is involved in supporting the testing, development, and qualification of the 12 kWe AEPS Hall thrusters for NASA's Power and Propulsion Element, intended for missions to the Moon, as well as testing related power processing systems.

His interest in identifying crucial research areas for effective propulsion systems has driven him towards systems and mission analysis of advanced propulsion systems, involving modeling innovative thruster concepts and trajectory analysis using fundamental physics equations.

James Gilland is a 2011 NIAC Fellow who researched the utilization of plasma wave radiation in planetary and interplanetary magnetoplasmas.

His specialties include high-power plasma sources, Helicon wave plasmas, radiofrequency plasma sources, Nuclear Electric Propulsion, and Fusion Space systems and mission design.

He is a member of the Phase Four Technical Advisory Board and has held various roles in reputable organizations such as the Ohio Aerospace Institute, Phase Four, Cleveland State University, Sverdrup Technology, and Aerojet Propulsion Research Institute.

James Gilland holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Physics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, an M.S.E. in Aerospace Engineering from Princeton University, and a B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University.

Highlights

Jan 19 · linkedin

My personal opinion is that using a nuclear thermal system for escape and capture, and the NEP interplanetary, is the most effective and fastest propulsion system for a Mars mission without having to resort to unproven gas core nuclear thermal or fusion propulsion. To my knowledge, no one at NASA has considered this option: the two baselines are all NTP, or Chem(LOX/CH4)/NEP. Both barely accomplish a mission that exceeds the lifetime radiation dose for the astronauts, due to the long (2 years) time in space for an Opposition mission.
Even that mission needs Isp's of 900s for NTP (greater than NERVA). An NTP at 600-800s, with the nominal NEP system used for the reference case, would be either faster or lighter than either of the baselines, with no more advanced development than already considered. The hydrogen tankage compared to chemical would mitigate this somewhat, but mass is also mass. There is a strong programmatic knee jerk reaction against having two nuclear systems, but if DRACO is going to be built for DoD regardless, it's not really a change for NASA to develop an NEP system that enables their missions, in combination with using a DRACO system that alone may not.

Jun 6 · linkedin

Space suits (and presumably an airlock) in the vacuum chamber. Perhaps an idea whose time has come (again)!

James Gilland
Add to my network

Location

Brook Park, Ohio, United States