Suggestions
James Peters
Innovating legal
James Peters is a legal vice president with a focus on product development and strategy. He has proven leadership skills in entrepreneurial settings, consistently delivering successful and innovative new products. Additionally, James serves as a practitioner mentor to law students and an adjunct professor, aiding students in preparing for the evolving legal services market.
James has a diverse educational background, including a JD in Law from the University of Michigan Law School, an MBA in Business Administration and Management from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a BA in Political Science, International Relations, and Environmental Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He has also pursued studies in Stop Motion Animation at the Armory Center for the Arts and Laws at University College London.
Throughout his career, James has held key roles in various organizations. He is currently the Managing Director at Pulse Global Services Limited. Previously, he served as the Head of Services and a Director at Pulse Global Services Limited, Vice President of New Market Initiatives at LegalZoom, Adjunct Professor at the University of Miami School of Law, and Michigan State University. He has also held positions at LegalZoom, including Vice President of Legal in the Attorney Services Division, Director of Legal Product Development, Managing Attorney, and Project Manager. Earlier in his career, James gained experience as a Summer Law Clerk at Colorado Lawyers for the Arts and the Colorado Lawyers Committee, and as a Youth Programming Coordinator at AmeriCorps VISTA.
Highlights
Public Service Announcement (and scam alert) RE Trademark Precision AND Trademark Orbiter:
I've been contacted by several people (well into double digits now - I'm actually glad people are investigating this!) asking if I'm involved with a company called Trademark Precision (and now Trademark Orbiter). To cut to the chase: I AM NOT AFFILIATED with Trademark Precision or Trademark Orbiter in any way whatsoever. This company is using not only my name, but also my California State Bar ID number to try to coerce businesses into purchasing services from them. It is a scam. Definitely not a set of events I had on my life as a lawyer bingo card, but a bit of an inherent risk in having our professional data out there in the open.
I've reported the company to the Trademarks Special Task Force on Improper Activities and the Office of Enrollment and Discipline.
If you're a business owner who has been contacted by this company please feel free to reach out to me. It's always good to have additional examples of the activity.
They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I'm going to go out on a limb and say they are wrong in this case. 😩
Business owners out there, the only companies I'm affiliated with today are LZ Legal Services and LegalZoom. If it's "me" coming at you from somewhere else it's probably a scam.
#trademarks #uspto #scamawareness
If you're in legal tech or legal innovation, chances are you've seen the paper entitled "Better Call GPT, Comparing Large Language Models Against Lawyers." It's mostly floated around for the cost comparison between Junior Lawyers and AI (spoiler alert: AI costs less than a lawyer). I'd sort of dismissed it as a novelty until I saw some further discussion of the results on legal quality (HT Alex Hamilton for kicking that off for me).
I'm a bit shocked I haven't seen more discussion of this in my feed as the results, in a nutshell as stated by the authors, are "Our empirical analysis benchmarks LLMs against a ground truth set by Senior Lawyers, uncovering that advanced models match or exceed human accuracy in determining legal issues."
Match or exceed human accuracy. This is a big deal. If these results can be replicated, it's a very big deal. AI errors have (understandably) been the hot topic in legal circles. We're very reluctant to compare error rates against out own human lawyer capabilities though and it tells a very interesting story.
