Suggestions
Pascal Finette
Co-Founder & Chief Heretic @ be radical.
Pascal Finette is a prominent figure in the technology and entrepreneurship space, currently serving as the Co-Founder and Chief Heretic at be radical.2 With nearly three decades of experience in the tech industry, Finette has established himself as a strategic advisor, thought leader, and innovator.2
Career Highlights
Technology Pioneer:: Finette started his journey in technology before the advent of web browsers, founding several tech startups and investing in early-stage companies.12
Corporate Leadership:: He has held significant positions at major tech companies:
- Led eBay's Platform Solutions Group in Europe
- Headed Mozilla's Innovation Lab and created their accelerator program WebFWD
- Worked at Google.org, investing in social impact organizations globally1
Entrepreneurship and Innovation:: Finette served as the Chair for Entrepreneurship & Open Innovation at Singularity University and as Executive Director at Fastrack.1
Current Roles and Initiatives
be radical:: As Co-Founder and Chief Heretic, Finette focuses on enabling leaders and learners to seize the future.2
TheHeretic.org:: He founded this platform, which includes an opinionated newsletter and podcast with tens of thousands of subscribers.2
Author:: Finette wrote the bestselling book "Disrupt Disruption – How to Decode the Future, Disrupt Your Industry, and Transform Your Business".2
Expertise and Focus
Finette's work centers on the intersection of technology, global impact, and leadership. He is known for:
- Inspiring and educating entrepreneurs and change-makers
- Addressing complex global challenges
- Providing insights on future trends and exponential technologies
- Developing future-robust business strategies12
Additional Roles
- Advisory Board Chair of EY's wavespace
- Member of Pearson's digital advisory board
- Jury Chair for science and innovation management at the Falling Walls Foundation2
Pascal Finette is based in Boulder, Colorado, and continues to be an influential voice in technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation.2
Highlights
👀 The Gestalt of Tech: What We Can Learn From Telegram’s Troubles — The recent arrest of Telegram’s founder and CEO Pavel Durov in France has sent shockwaves through the internet community. Comments on the evolving situation range from outcries about an assault on freedom of speech to “I told you so”. These are interspersed with analyses of why Telegram could be considered a critical piece of communications infrastructure (e.g., in the ongoing war in Ukraine) and assertions that Telegram is not actually secure (at least in its default settings).
Regardless of where you find yourself on this multifaceted spectrum of opinion, the situation highlights an important point we regularly make when assessing signals and trends: You have to take the Gestalt into account.
Gestalt, a distinctly German concept, means “shape” or “form” and encapsulates the idea that we ought to look at the world as integrated wholes rather than merely the sum of its parts. In other words, we can’t just look at a technology and its application, such as the messaging network Telegram, as an isolated app that runs on some servers and connects its members through the Internet. We must see it in the context of many other dimensions.
To assess these additional dimensions, many acronyms exist – STEEP(S), PESTLE, and others. They all encapsulate similar ideas and concepts. STEEPS, for example, stands for Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, and Sustainability. These frameworks are based on the important insight that you have to look at a product, service, or situation through multiple lenses. An important lens in all these frameworks is the political as well as social (and legal) framework.
This is where the Telegram story comes back to us. Durov operated Telegram as if it would function solely in the context of its technological and economic dimensions, with little regard for the legal and political framework in which his company and product existed. This approach might work for a while, but eventually, often when the product or service in question becomes significant, the other factors in the acronym start to exert their influence. In Durov’s case, this led to his arrest on charges related to his company’s non-responsiveness to requests from French authorities to moderate some of the content on the platform. A similar story is currently unfolding at X, where Musk’s refusal to comply with orders from the Brazilian government resulted in his platform being banned in the country.
Regardless of one’s stance on whether these actions are right or wrong, these incidents serve as important reminders to consider the gestalt of things. It’s crucial not to operate under the mistaken assumption that only certain aspects of the futurist’s acronym soup matter. For businesses and policymakers alike, understanding and addressing all these dimensions can mean the difference between success and failure, compliance and legal troubles.
🥊 A Tale of Two Companies — COVID-darling Zoom just announced that they raised the limit of participants in a single call to a staggering 1 million viewers (after the Harris/Walz fundraisers across the US broke Zoom records. Meanwhile, Microsoft’s competitor Teams proudly announced that their app finally allows for your private and work accounts to be used by a single app—previously, you needed to have two versions of Teams installed to separate your personal from your work calls. I guess that tells you everything you need to know about Zoom and Teams.
↗ https://lnkd.in/gVMVkNH7
↗ https://lnkd.in/gYvg-EWY
#Zoom #Microsoft #Teams #VideoCall #WFH #COVID
