Suggestions
Paul Viola
Distinguished Engineer at Microsoft
Paul Viola is a Distinguished Engineer at Microsoft with a notable background in computer vision research.12 He has an impressive career spanning academia and industry, with previous experience as a professor at MIT and a vice president of science.2
Professional Background
Viola's expertise is evident in his contributions to the field of computer science. He holds a doctorate from MIT and has been awarded 35 patents, showcasing his innovative approach to technology. His work has been widely recognized, with over 19,000 citations of his research publications.5
Current Role
As a Distinguished Engineer at Microsoft, Viola is based in the Seattle area, specifically in Kirkland, Washington.14 This high-level position reflects his significant contributions to the company and the field of technology.
Research and Interests
Viola's research focus has been on computer vision, an area where he has made substantial contributions.2 Recently, he has shown interest in emerging technologies and their potential applications, as evidenced by his LinkedIn posts discussing topics like mobile robotics and drone delivery systems.3
Networking and Influence
With over 500 connections on LinkedIn, Viola maintains an active professional network.1 His experience and expertise make him a valuable resource in the tech industry, particularly in areas related to artificial intelligence and computer vision.
Paul Viola's LinkedIn profile can be found under the username "violapaul", which aligns with the information provided in the query.
Highlights
Hey LinkedIn braintrust. There is so much noise flying around the recent advances in LLMs and if they are AGI (or on the road to AGI, or a dead end).
Anyone know of a nice reference to the more practical issues? Sort of at the Scientific American level? Perhaps a list of 5-10 articles would do the trick. Or a very recent book.
I have had a number of friends ask. The stuff I read is not what they would find helpful.
My previous post was about how #spacex and #tesla seem to have achieved so much, so rapidly, with few built in advantages. I know nothing about how they run internally. Anyone have some wisdom to share??
There is accepted wisdom about what makes a productive workplace. Collaborative teams. Supportive and safe environments. Inclusion.
I think that if you are trying to get the most out of your existing workforce this can be a big deal. You are essentially trying to substitute loyalty to the team (which is natural for humans) for loyalty to the vision or the product. Most products don't exactly attract a lot of loyalty... "we are going to create the best darn laundry soap ever!". But many people can love their team.
Being supportive, collaborative, and inclusive is important for kids sports teams. There is no way to keep them engaged if you don't give them all positive feedback, or if some kids never get to play. But there is a huge transition as teams get more competitive (say high school teams that want to win the state championship). In that environment folks are given roles based on their ability to contribute (though it is often overlooked that a good player makes the players around them better). Its a tough transition for many kids, and many don't make the cut (like me!). But if you can't score or defend then you may not stay on the team. Of course there are "no cut" teams and recreational teams. Good fun, but no championships.
I suppose you could ask if your employees are more like the young kids or the high school champs.
I have only been in a few scrums (and of course there are many ways to run a scrum). But I feel the biggest value is that the team stands up and looks at each other every morning. Everyone presents progress. And it is hard to come in for 3 days straight and not have made progress. A good scrum master will quickly ask: "do you need help?", "should we transfer the workitem to someone else?". Scrums are not confrontational (if done well). But letting down the team, publicly, in the scrum is a powerful motivator.
Friendly competition helps as well. I remember working with collaborators that could get a ton of work done in 24 hours. I quickly realized that I wanted to get just as much done. And that gave me additional motivation.
What is the most productive environment folks have worked in? Not the one that was most fun/easy/relaxing (though it could have been).
Why was it productive?
How can we setup processes and mechanisms that create these environments?
